Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Feb 24 16:51:37 2015
New Revision: 1662022
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1662022
Log:
* STATUS: Add another nomination.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1662022&r1=1662021&r2=1662022&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Feb 24 16:51:37 2015
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Candidate changes:
Depends on, and is based of the ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-db-verify
branch. Merges: r1661570,1661654,1661664,1661669,1661673,1661695,1661698
.
- Recommended way to review: check branch.
+ Recommended way to review: check branch and its log message.
Votes:
+1: rhuijben
@@ -144,6 +144,25 @@ Candidate changes:
.
Another reason to backport this, is that it fixes how we use the
database operations that remove nodes.
+ .
+ Recommended way to review: check branch and its log message.
+ Votes:
+ +1: rhuijben
+
+ * ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-update-delete
+ Fix the creation of 'copies' when during update BASE is deleted, but
+ local changes exists.
+ Justification:
+ Without this patch copies of mixed-revision working copies miss
+ the not-present nodes in the intermediate layers, and moves are
+ not properly moved to the copy and/or broken.
+ Notes:
+ This feature depends on and is based of the
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-commit-fixes branch. The
+ 1.9.x-update-tc-detection touches some of the same tests and either
+ might need rebasing depending on which of the branches is merged first.
+ .
+ Recommended way to review: check branch and its log message.
Votes:
+1: rhuijben
