Author: rhuijben
Date: Mon Mar 9 20:26:28 2015
New Revision: 1665346
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1665346
Log:
* subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
(ra_revision_errors): Add comment.
Modified:
subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c?rev=1665346&r1=1665345&r2=1665346&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c Mon Mar 9 20:26:28
2015
@@ -819,7 +819,16 @@ ra_revision_errors(const svn_test_opts_t
svn_error_t *err;
void *edit_baton;
+ /* This function DOESN'T use a scratch/iter pool between requests...
+ That has a reason: some ra layers (e.g. Serf) are sensitive to
+ reusing the same pool. In that case they may produce bad results
+ that they wouldn't do (as often) when the pool wasn't reused.
+
+ It the amount of memory used gets too big we should probably split
+ this test... as the reuse already discovered a few issues that
+ are now resolved in ra_serf.
+ */
SVN_ERR(make_and_open_repos(&ra_session, "ra_revision_errors",
opts, pool));
