Author: stefan2
Date: Tue Apr 14 18:01:18 2015
New Revision: 1673483
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1673483
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for & approve the r1667233 group.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1673483&r1=1673482&r2=1673483&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Apr 14 18:01:18 2015
@@ -15,24 +15,6 @@ Status of 1.9.0:
Release blockers for 1.9.0:
===========================
- * r1667233, r1667301
- Reject invalid get-location-segments requests in mod_dav_svn and svnserve.
- Justification:
- Security issue.
- Notes:
- r1667233 is the fix itself. r1667301 fixes svnserve protocol violation
- when the sanity check in get_location_segments() fails. The backport
- branch is required to avoid a trunk-specific behavior change in terms
- of the error code, i.e., to still use the SVN_ERR_INCORRECT_PARAMS
- instead of the SVN_ERR_FS_NO_SUCH_REVISION.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-r1667233
- Votes:
- +1: kotkov, philip
- -0: rhuijben (causes an svn protocol error without further patches such
- as the patch applied in r1667301; vote happened before
- the '1.9.x-r1667233' backport branch)
-
Candidate changes that cannot go into a later 1.9.x:
====================================================
@@ -342,3 +324,21 @@ Approved changes:
on /trunk.
Votes:
+1: stefan2, rhuijben, philip
+
+ * r1667233, r1667301
+ Reject invalid get-location-segments requests in mod_dav_svn and svnserve.
+ Justification:
+ Security issue.
+ Notes:
+ r1667233 is the fix itself. r1667301 fixes svnserve protocol violation
+ when the sanity check in get_location_segments() fails. The backport
+ branch is required to avoid a trunk-specific behavior change in terms
+ of the error code, i.e., to still use the SVN_ERR_INCORRECT_PARAMS
+ instead of the SVN_ERR_FS_NO_SUCH_REVISION.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-r1667233
+ Votes:
+ +1: kotkov, philip, stefan2
+ -0: rhuijben (causes an svn protocol error without further patches such
+ as the patch applied in r1667301; vote happened before
+ the '1.9.x-r1667233' backport branch)
