Den tis 16 feb. 2021 kl 11:34 skrev Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de>: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:46:08PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 20:39:23 -0000: > > > Author: stsp > > > Date: Wed Feb 10 20:39:22 2021 > > > New Revision: 1886396 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1886396&view=rev > > > Log: > > > site/publish: Merge from staging area. > > > > For future reference, this commit should have used the "less than 24 hours > > ago" syntax: > > > > % cd site/publish > > % grep -R -h -9 YYYY | vipe > > <!-- A parameter in the form '?update=YYYYMMDDhhmm' may > > be appended to 'download.cgi' to only offer mirrors that have > > synced after the specified date. We update it after a security > > release when the email announcement is less than 24 hours after > > the upload to /dist/release, in order to prevent offering mirrors > > that don't carry the just-released artifacts. --> > > % > > > > More below. > > > > > +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Wed Feb 10 20:39:22 2021 > > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > > > limitations under the License. > > > --> > > > <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/";> > > > - <created>2010-12-28</created> > > > + <created>2021-02-10</created> > > > > Huh? > > > > Quoting http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap: > > > > > > <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#created";> > > > > <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"; /> > > > > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">created</rdfs:label> > > > > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Date when something was created, in > > > > YYYY-MM-DD form. e.g. 2004-04-05</rdfs:comment> > > > > ⋮ > > > > </rdf:Property> > > > > The entity referred to by the <Project/> tag wasn't created in 2021. So, > > I think the hunk is incorrect… but so was the original value, which > > referred to > > the _file_'s creation date (r1053461), rather than to the date Subversion > > was > > founded (2000), the date it was accepted into the Incubator, or the date it > > was > > promoted to TLP.
Should this be reverted, maybe even back to the proper creation date (2000-02-29)? > > > > Thanks for RMing, > > > > Daniel > > > > Thanks for checking. > > I think in both of these cases it would have helped to have more specific > instructions for how to update these files in our release manager's manual > of the community guide. What do you think about this? [[[ List the new release on ^/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf There should be a <release> section for each supported minor release with the <created> and <revision> being updated to the current release date and patch release number. Do not change anything else in the file (in particular the <created> under <Project> is the date when the Subversion project was created). ]]] Kind regards, Daniel Sahlberg
