Den tors 14 juli 2022 kl 15:52 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:29 +00:00: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:55 AM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > >> Should the entry link to the zsh script > >> ( > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/202008.mbox/%3C20200816130713.6abca815%40tarpaulin.shahaf.local2%3E > ) > >> as well, as an alternative? It might be useful for someone if their > >> environment doesn't have Python installed or if they find the zsh script > >> easier to audit. > > > > I think it would be useful, and... > > > >> (Well, I suppose it might make more sense to copy the script > >> somewhere than to link to an immutable archives message with that > >> subject line.) > > > > ...the place to put it is probably tools/client-side/ just like the > > Python script. > > Being in tools/ would imply dev@ accepts responsibility for bug reports > against the zsh script. Is dev@ happy to do that? I'm concerned about > the bus factor. > I was just about to say the same thing (and with no intention to discredit the zsh version). If it is desirable to list all available realms and let the user choose interactively, I could add that to the Python script. I was also going to add that I think it is better to provide one tool and make sure that tool is working well instead of having two tools that differ only in tiny details, since they might bit-rot in different ways over time and it might be hard for a newcomer to understand the motivation of having different tools. Kind regards, Daniel
