[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787972#action_12787972
]
Joost Schouten commented on TAP5-945:
-------------------------------------
that'll fix it then ;-) thx. Just wondered since the JDK bug was reported
against 1.4.
> Unnecessary and severe lock contention in PerthreadManagerImpl
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-945
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-945
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
> Reporter: Olle Hallin
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0.0
>
>
> When load testing our new high-volume site before soft launch, we found that
> we have severe lock contention in
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.PerthreadManagerImpl.
> It synchronizes on "this" before invoking ThreadLocal.get() and
> ThreadLocal.remove(), which I believe is unnecessary.
> During our tests, approximately 35% of all Tomcat threads were waiting for
> this lock in any of 10 thread dumps taken 15 seconds apart.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
