[CONF] Apache Tapestry > Tapestry's Performance Tested

[confluence]

Tapestry's Performance Tested Blog post edited by Howard M. Lewis Ship Changes (1) ... !http://www.jtict.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/conc_users_graph_small.jpg|align=left,border=1! {html}<br clear="left">{html} There's a lot more details in the posting; Tapestry out-performed the JSP version of the test application, as well as all of the other component-based frameworks, and most of the action-oriented frameworks. ... Full Content We make bold claims right on the front page about performance and back that up with usually anecdotal evidence. It's nice that a disinterested third party has come up with their own framework performance shootout, covering everthing from Rails to Play to Wicket to (thanks to Kalle) Tapestry 5.2.5. I have to say that Tapestry significantly rocked: There's a lot more details in the posting; Tapestry out-performed the JSP version of the test application, as well as all of the other component-based frameworks, and most of the action-oriented frameworks. It's not charted, but Tapestry does pretty well in terms of memory and CPU utilization: Tapestry has been getting faster, release-on-release. Kalle has promised to update the Tapestry test application to 5.3 once at least a stable alpha release is available and I expect to see some incremental speed improvement, and some more visible reduction in memory utilization. Change Notification Preferences View Online | View Changes