Documentation for Mixins and Informal Parameters is not correct.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TAP5-1846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1846
Project: Tapestry 5
Issue Type: Bug
Components: documentation
Affects Versions: 5.3
Reporter: Barry Books
Priority: Minor
The current documentation states:
If the component and a Mixin both define a parameter with the same name, then
the component wins: the component's parameter will be bound, and the Mixin's
parameter will be unbound.
Alternately, you may prefix the name of the parameter with the unqualified name
of the Mixin class
It's not clear from this statement what happens to unqualified informal
parameters when the component and Mixins support informal parameters but it
appears the current implementation will never assign any informal parameters to
a component if you add a Mixin that supports informal parameters. Please add
something like the following to the documentation:
In the case of informal parameters without a qualifier the Mixin that supports
informal parameters will receive the all the unqualified informal parameters.
If more than one Mixin supports informal parameters the results are undefined.
Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
