[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoff Callender updated TAP5-2416:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
In some cases, a component may want to respond to an AJAX event in another 
component. For example a component that display a user's name would want to 
know when a user-editing component in the same page has successfully updated 
the user via AJAX.

In simple pages it can be handled this way: the server-side event handler 
bubbles up a "user changed" event up to its container, and the container can 
call down to any interested component it contains and the component could use 
AjaxResponseRenderer#addRender(...). The container could also bubble up the 
event, and so it repeats right up to the page level.

However, in more complex pages this gets clunky and problematic. It would be 
nice to use a publish/subscribe mechanism. But should the mechanism be 
server-side, or client-side?

Server-side has a fundamental stumbling block: the server-side is usually 
stateless. An AJAX request can contain enough info to tell the server-side 
component what state is required, but typically it would be only enough for 
that component. It could publish its success, but the subscribing components 
may not have enough information to correctly mimic their client-side's current 
state and would therefore be unable to do anything useful. This has been 
discussed extensively in TAP5-2383 .

In contrast, the client-side knows exactly the state of every component, so it 
is the ideal place to do the publish/subscribe.

Quoting from TAP5-2383...

How about a mechanism along these lines:
- give the Zone component a "refreshOnMessage" parameter, specifying a message 
string; and
- give AjaxResponseRenderer a publishMessage(String s) method; and
Tapestry could do the rest, client-side: it receives the message string, 
identifies all the zone instances that asked to be refreshed when that string 
appears, and triggers a refresh of each one.

For example:

- In onSuccessFromPersonForm(), do 
ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded");
- client-side, Tapestry would identify each subscriber, ie. each zone in the 
DOM that was created with refreshOnMessage="personAdded"; and trigger refresh 
on that zone. It would be a second request, but so what? Asynch is the rule 
these days, not the exception.

The most likely use of this mechanism would be for something that shows a count 
of persons to update itself: Persons (27), just as in the example that prompted 
this JIRA: 
http://apache-tapestry-mailing-list-archives.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Different-Zone-Update-s-tt5728186.html
 .

If there's a need for a context, e.g. personId, then I think we could handle 
it. Perhaps ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded").with(personId). 
However, I haven't thought through how to handle it in the subscribing zones.


  was:
In some cases, a component may want to respond to an AJAX event in another 
component. For example a component that display a user's name would want to 
know when a user-editing component in the same page has successfully updated 
the user via AJAX.

In simple pages it can be handled this way: the server-side event handler 
bubbles up a "user changed" event up to its container, and the container can 
call down to any interested component it contains. The container could also 
bubble up the event, and so on up to the page level.

However, in more complex pages it would be nice to use a publish/subscribe 
mechanism. But should it be server-side or client-side?

Server-side has a fundamental stumbling block: the server-side is usually 
stateless. An AJAX request can contain enough info to tell the server-side 
component what state is required, but typically it would be only enough for 
that component. It could publish its success, but the subscribing components 
may not have enough information to correctly mimic their client-side's current 
state and would therefore be unable to do anything useful. This has been 
discussed extensively in TAP5-2383 .

In contrast, the client-side knows exactly the state of every component, so it 
is the ideal place to do the publish/subscribe.

Quoting from TAP5-2383...

How about a mechanism along these lines:
- give the Zone component a "refreshOnMessage" parameter, specifying a message 
string; and
- give AjaxResponseRenderer a publishMessage(String s) method; and
Tapestry could do the rest, client-side: it receives the message string, 
identifies all the zone instances that asked to be refreshed when that string 
appears, and triggers a refresh of each one.

For example:

- In onSuccessFromPersonForm(), do 
ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded");
- client-side, Tapestry would identify each subscriber, ie. each zone in the 
DOM that was created with refreshOnMessage="personAdded"; and trigger refresh 
on that zone. It would be a second request, but so what? Asynch is the rule 
these days, not the exception.

The most likely use of this mechanism would be for something that shows a count 
of persons to update itself: Persons (27), just as in the example that prompted 
this JIRA: 
http://apache-tapestry-mailing-list-archives.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Different-Zone-Update-s-tt5728186.html
 .

If there's a need for a context, e.g. personId, then I think we could handle 
it. Perhaps ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded").with(personId). 
However, I haven't thought through how to handle it in the subscribing zones.



> Client-side publish/subscribe mechanism
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2416
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.4
>            Reporter: Geoff Callender
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In some cases, a component may want to respond to an AJAX event in another 
> component. For example a component that display a user's name would want to 
> know when a user-editing component in the same page has successfully updated 
> the user via AJAX.
> In simple pages it can be handled this way: the server-side event handler 
> bubbles up a "user changed" event up to its container, and the container can 
> call down to any interested component it contains and the component could use 
> AjaxResponseRenderer#addRender(...). The container could also bubble up the 
> event, and so it repeats right up to the page level.
> However, in more complex pages this gets clunky and problematic. It would be 
> nice to use a publish/subscribe mechanism. But should the mechanism be 
> server-side, or client-side?
> Server-side has a fundamental stumbling block: the server-side is usually 
> stateless. An AJAX request can contain enough info to tell the server-side 
> component what state is required, but typically it would be only enough for 
> that component. It could publish its success, but the subscribing components 
> may not have enough information to correctly mimic their client-side's 
> current state and would therefore be unable to do anything useful. This has 
> been discussed extensively in TAP5-2383 .
> In contrast, the client-side knows exactly the state of every component, so 
> it is the ideal place to do the publish/subscribe.
> Quoting from TAP5-2383...
> How about a mechanism along these lines:
> - give the Zone component a "refreshOnMessage" parameter, specifying a 
> message string; and
> - give AjaxResponseRenderer a publishMessage(String s) method; and
> Tapestry could do the rest, client-side: it receives the message string, 
> identifies all the zone instances that asked to be refreshed when that string 
> appears, and triggers a refresh of each one.
> For example:
> - In onSuccessFromPersonForm(), do 
> ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded");
> - client-side, Tapestry would identify each subscriber, ie. each zone in the 
> DOM that was created with refreshOnMessage="personAdded"; and trigger refresh 
> on that zone. It would be a second request, but so what? Asynch is the rule 
> these days, not the exception.
> The most likely use of this mechanism would be for something that shows a 
> count of persons to update itself: Persons (27), just as in the example that 
> prompted this JIRA: 
> http://apache-tapestry-mailing-list-archives.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Different-Zone-Update-s-tt5728186.html
>  .
> If there's a need for a context, e.g. personId, then I think we could handle 
> it. Perhaps 
> ajaxResponseRenderer.publishMessage("personAdded").with(personId). However, I 
> haven't thought through how to handle it in the subscribing zones.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to