Luca Arzeni created TAP5-2592:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Classloader issues under JBoss 6.X - 7.X (and I guess it 
affects most other application servers)
                 Key: TAP5-2592
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2592
             Project: Tapestry 5
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: plastic
    Affects Versions: 5.4.3, 5.4.2, 5.4.1, 5.3.8
            Reporter: Luca Arzeni
            Priority: Minor


few years ago, I raised an alert concerning the compatibility between Tapestry5 
and JBoss; the thread was: 

"Is tapestry plastic incompatible with JEE specs?" 

https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tapestry-users/201512.mbox/%3Ctrinity-fc3b0e36-0402-4d71-b48a-4a464cbd6474-1449857158334@3capp-mailcom-lxa14%3E

At that time I found a workaround and concluded that there was no way to solve 
the issue, thinking that was a problem related to the jboss classloader (or, 
more generally, between an appserver classloader and the behaviour of plastic). 

Few days ago, working on a new project under JBoss 7.0.0.GA, I was again badly 
hitted by this problem, but this time I investigated more thoroughly the issue 
and I found the source of all evil: the class 
"org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm.ClassWriter" of plastic. 

The classloader used to find (and load) the classes by plastic is really not 
compatible with an appserver. An appserver is required to enforce classloaded 
isolation and plastic ignores this. 
Anyway plastic can be patched to solve the issue; here I attach a patch, please 
I ask to some developer to kindly forward and apply this patch to the 5.4.x 
branch and to the 5.5. 

I also want to give thanks to these guys to help me to focus the problem: 

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42423907/unable-to-move-tapestry-jars-out-of-the-war-with-page-code-inside-the-war-still
https://blog.progs.be/50/tapestry-classloading-problems-on-jboss

Regards, 
Luca Arzeni 


*** Here is the original code: *** 

1752     protected String getCommonSuperClass(final String type1, final String 
type2) { 
1753         Class<?> c, d; 
1754         ClassLoader classLoader = getClass().getClassLoader(); 
1755         try { 
1756             c = Class.forName(type1.replace('/', '.'), false, 
classLoader); 
1757             d = Class.forName(type2.replace('/', '.'), false, 
classLoader); 
1758         } catch (Exception e) { 
1759             throw new RuntimeException(e.toString()); 
1760         } 
1761         if (c.isAssignableFrom(d)) { 
1762             return type1; 
1763         } 
1764         if (d.isAssignableFrom(c)) { 
1765             return type2; 
1766         } 
1767         if (c.isInterface() || d.isInterface()) { 
1768             return "java/lang/Object"; 
1769         } else { 
1770             do { 
1771                 c = c.getSuperclass(); 
1772             } while (!c.isAssignableFrom(d)); 
1773             return c.getName().replace('.', '/'); 
1774         } 
1775     } 

*** Here is the patch: *** 

1752    protected String getCommonSuperClass(final String type1, final String 
type2) { 
1753        Class<?> c, d; 
1754        ClassLoader classLoader = getClass().getClassLoader(); 
1755        try { 
1756            c = Class.forName(type1.replace('/', '.'), false, classLoader); 
1757            d = Class.forName(type2.replace('/', '.'), false, classLoader); 
1758        } catch (Exception e) { 
// --- ARZILLO PATCH BEGIN 
----------------------------------------------------------- 

    System.err.println("WARNING: type1:" + type1 + ", type2: " + type2 + ", 
exception: " + e + ", classLoader: " + classLoader +", attempting to use the 
classloader of the current thread"); 

    classLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(); 
        if ( classLoader != null ) { 

        try { 
        c = Class.forName(type1.replace('/', '.'), false, classLoader); 
        d = Class.forName(type2.replace('/', '.'), false, classLoader); 
        } 
                catch (Exception e_inner) { 
            System.err.println("ERROR 1: type1:" + type1 + ", type2: " + type2 
+ ", e_inner: " + e_inner + ", classLoader: " + classLoader +", failed even 
using the classloader of the current thread"); 
            throw new RuntimeException(e_inner.toString()); 
                } 
        } 
        else { 
        System.err.println("ERROR 2: type1:" + type1 + ", type2: " + type2 + ", 
exception: " + e + ", classLoader: " + classLoader +", unable to get the 
classloader of the current thread"); 
        throw new RuntimeException(e.toString()); 
        } 
// --- ARZILLO PATCH END 
----------------------------------------------------------- 
1760        } 
1761    if (c.isAssignableFrom(d)) { 
1762            return type1; 
1763        } 
1764        if (d.isAssignableFrom(c)) { 
1765            return type2; 
1766        } 
1767        if (c.isInterface() || d.isInterface()) { 
1768            return "java/lang/Object"; 
1779        } else { 
1770            do { 
1771                c = c.getSuperclass(); 
1772            } while (!c.isAssignableFrom(d)); 
1773            return c.getName().replace('.', '/'); 
1774        } 
1775    } 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to