Modified: websites/production/tapestry/content/javascript-rewrite-in-54.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/production/tapestry/content/javascript-rewrite-in-54.html 
(original)
+++ websites/production/tapestry/content/javascript-rewrite-in-54.html Sat Feb  
3 18:21:36 2018
@@ -36,13 +36,26 @@
 
   <div class="wrapper bs">
 
-        <div id="navigation"><div class="nav"><ul class="alternate"><li><a  
href="index.html">Home</a></li><li><a  href="getting-started.html">Getting 
Started</a></li><li><a  href="documentation.html">Documentation</a></li><li><a  
href="download.html">Download</a></li><li><a  
href="about.html">About</a></li><li><a  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0";>License</a></li><li><a  
href="community.html">Community</a></li><li><a  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/security/";>Security</a></li><li><a  
class="external-link" href="http://www.apache.org/";>Apache</a></li><li><a  
class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html";>Sponsorship</a></li><li><a
  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html";>Thanks</a></li></ul></div></div>
+        <div id="navigation"><div class="nav"><ul class="alternate"><li><a  
href="index.html">Home</a></li><li><a  href="getting-started.html">Getting 
Started</a></li><li><a  href="documentation.html">Documentation</a></li><li><a  
href="download.html">Download</a></li><li><a  
href="about.html">About</a></li><li><a  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0";>License</a></li><li><a  
href="community.html">Community</a></li><li><a  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/security/";>Security</a></li><li><a  
class="external-link" href="http://www.apache.org/";>Apache</a></li><li><a  
class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html";>Sponsorship</a></li><li><a
  class="external-link" 
href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html";>Thanks</a></li></ul></div>
+
+</div>
 
           <div id="top">
-            <div id="smallbanner"><div class="searchbox" 
style="float:right;margin: .3em 1em .1em 1em"><span style="color: #999; 
font-size: 90%">Tapestry docs, issues, wikis &amp; blogs:</span><form 
enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="get" 
action="http://tapestry.apache.org/search.html";> 
- <input type="text" name="q"> 
- <input type="submit" value="Search"> 
-</form></div><div class="emblem" style="float:left"><p><a  
href="index.html"><span class="confluence-embedded-file-wrapper"><img 
class="confluence-embedded-image confluence-external-resource" 
src="http://tapestry.apache.org/images/tapestry_small.png"; 
data-image-src="http://tapestry.apache.org/images/tapestry_small.png";></span></a></p></div><div
 class="title" style="float:left; margin: 0 0 0 3em"><h1 
id="SmallBanner-PageTitle">JavaScript Rewrite in 5.4</h1></div></div>
+            <div id="smallbanner"><div class="searchbox" 
style="float:right;margin: .3em 1em .1em 1em"><span style="color: #999; 
font-size: 90%">Tapestry docs, issues, wikis &amp; blogs:</span>
+<form enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="get" 
action="http://tapestry.apache.org/search.html";>
+  <input type="text" name="q">
+  <input type="submit" value="Search">
+</form>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="emblem" style="float:left"><p><a  href="index.html"><span 
class="confluence-embedded-file-wrapper"><img class="confluence-embedded-image 
confluence-external-resource" 
src="http://tapestry.apache.org/images/tapestry_small.png"; 
data-image-src="http://tapestry.apache.org/images/tapestry_small.png";></span></a></p></div>
+
+
+<div class="title" style="float:left; margin: 0 0 0 3em"><h1 
id="SmallBanner-PageTitle">JavaScript Rewrite in 5.4</h1></div>
+
+</div>
       <div class="clearer"></div>
       </div>
 
@@ -55,17 +68,21 @@
 
       <div id="content">
                 <div id="ConfluenceContent"><p><style 
type="text/css">/*<![CDATA[*/
-div.rbtoc1478607611980 {padding: 0px;}
-div.rbtoc1478607611980 ul {list-style: disc;margin-left: 0px;}
-div.rbtoc1478607611980 li {margin-left: 0px;padding-left: 0px;}
+div.rbtoc1517682048738 {padding: 0px;}
+div.rbtoc1517682048738 ul {list-style: disc;margin-left: 0px;}
+div.rbtoc1517682048738 li {margin-left: 0px;padding-left: 0px;}
 
-/*]]>*/</style></p><div class="toc-macro rbtoc1478607611980">
+/*]]>*/</style></p><div class="toc-macro rbtoc1517682048738">
 <ul class="toc-indentation"><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryandJavaScript">Tapestry and 
JavaScript</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryJavaScriptLimitations(through5.3)">Tapestry
 JavaScript Limitations (through 5.3)</a>
 <ul class="toc-indentation"><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-DependenceonPrototype/Scriptaculous">Dependence 
on Prototype/Scriptaculous</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofDocumentation">Lack of 
Documentation</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofModuleStructure">Lack of Module 
Structure</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ComplexInitialization">Complex 
Initialization</a></li></ul>
 </li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-JavaScriptImprovementsfor5.4">JavaScript 
Improvements for 5.4</a>
 <ul class="toc-indentation"><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-RequireJS">RequireJS</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-SlowPageLoadandInitialization">Slow Page Load and 
Initialization</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MappingModulestoAssets">Mapping Modules to 
Assets</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtensionstoJavaScriptSupport">Extensions to 
JavaScriptSupport</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-AvoidingJavaScriptClasses">Avoiding JavaScript 
Classes</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExposeGlobalMessageCatalogtoClient">Expose Global 
Message Catalog to Client</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-PartialPageUpdateResponse">Partial Page Update 
Response</a></li></ul>
 </li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MaintainingBackwardsCompatibility">Maintaining 
Backwards Compatibility</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TwitterBootstrap">Twitter 
Bootstrap</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ContentDeliveryNetworkIntegration">Content 
Delivery Network Integration</a></li><li><a  
href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtJSCompatibility">ExtJS 
Compatibility</a></li><li><a  href="#JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MoreThoughts">More 
Thoughts</a></li></ul>
-</div><h1 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryandJavaScript">Tapestry and 
JavaScript</h1><p>Tapestry 5 has had a interesting mix of 
characteristics.</p><p>On the one hand, it has had a large number of features 
that work, and work well, right out of the box, with no special configuration 
or setup. This includes client-side validation, dynamic content updates, simple 
animations, progressive enhancement, and other standard Ajax and DHTML use 
cases.</p><p>In addition, Tapestry has evolved, from Tapestry 5.0 through 5.3, 
into a quite capable <em>provisioning</em> framework:</p><ul><li>JavaScript 
libraries may be combined into <em>stacks</em> that are combined (in 
production) into a single virtual file</li><li>JavaScript libraries and CSS 
files may be minified</li><li>Libraries, stacks, and other resources are 
exposed to the browser with a versioned URL and far-future expires header, to 
support aggressive client-caching</li><li>Resources, including JavaScript and 
CSS, can be distributed in
 side JARs (as part of reusable component libraries)</li><li>Compressible 
resources will be automatically GZip compressed if the client supports 
it</li></ul><p>However, JavaScript support in Tapestry is still unsatisfactory. 
Too often, Tapestry falls into an <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley"; rel="nofollow">uncanny 
valley</a> where the framework (server-side and client-side) does so much 
automatically that it becomes accepted that it does everything ... developers 
later discover, to their dismay, that the last 10% of custom behavior they 
desire is very hard to implement, because of all the common problems that 
plague any complex system: insufficient APIs, unexpected leaky abstractions, or 
just plain bugs.</p><p>Common examples of the challenges imposed by Tapestry 
include implementing a Confirm mixin, customizing behavior when a Zone 
component is dynamically updated, or any number of issues related to Forms, 
form elements, and Ajax updates.</
 p><p>This document is a roadmap for how Tapestry 5.4 will revisit the 
relationship between server-side Java and client-side JavaScript. Ultimately, 
we hope to convert this relationship from an obstacle to using Tapestry into an 
essential reason to select Tapestry in the first place.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryJavaScriptLimitations(through5.3)">Tapestry 
JavaScript Limitations (through 5.3)</h1><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-DependenceonPrototype/Scriptaculous">Dependence on 
Prototype/Scriptaculous</h2><p>Tapestry made an early choice to embrace 
Prototype and Scriptaculous at a time when this made sense, circa 
2006-2007.</p><p>The goal was to have Tapestry provide a client-side API, the 
<code>Tapestry</code> namespace, that in turn would delegate complex behaviors 
(including DOM element selection, event management, and XmlHttpRequest 
processing) to a <em>foundational framework</em>. The goal was to isolate all 
the direct dependencies on Prototype in such a way that it w
 ould be possible, in the future, to swap out for a different foundational 
framework, such as jQuery or ExtJS. Unfortunately, expediency has proven to 
make this goal even less reachable!</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofDocumentation">Lack of 
Documentation</h2><p>There has not, to date, been an adequate documentation of 
the <code>T5</code> and <code>Tapestry</code> namespaces, beyond the code 
itself.</p><h2 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofModuleStructure">Lack of Module 
Structure</h2><p>Beyond the basic use of namespaces, Tapestry has not embraced 
modern JavaScript usage; specifically, it makes limited use of <em>hygenic 
functions</em> to form modules. Hygenic functions are JavaScript functions that 
exist as a way to encapsulate private properties and functions. Tapestry 5.3 
makes more use of this pattern than previous releases.</p><p>What modularity is 
present in the JavaScript is organized around the <code>T5.initializers</code> 
(<code>Tapestry.Initializers</code>) namespac
 e, and the mechanics of full-page and partial-page renders (described more 
fully below).</p><h2 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ComplexInitialization">Complex 
Initialization</h2><p>Many users are perplexed by how Tapestry performs 
initialization. In typical web page construction, the developer would create a 
<code>&lt;script&gt;</code> block at the bottom of the page, and do 
initializations there. In Tapestry, it can be much more complex:</p><ul><li>A 
JavaScript library, containing one or more <em>initialization functions</em>, 
is created</li><li>The initialization functions must be <a  
class="external-link" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patching"; 
rel="nofollow">monkey patched</a> into the T5.initializers (or older 
Tapestry.Initializers) namespace.</li><li>The <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/JavaScriptSupport.html";>JavaScriptSupport</a>
 environmental must be used to invoke the function, by nam
 e, passing it a JSONObject to configure itself (the 
"specification")</li><li>The affected element must have a unique id attribute, 
used to coordinate the initialization in the client web browser. (Tapestry 
assists with unique id allocation, but it would be much better if unique ids 
were not necessary.)</li></ul><p>This often feels like overkill, but it is 
necessary for a number of desirable characteristics:</p><ul><li>Initialization 
code occurs in a single Tapestry-generated <code>&lt;script&gt;</code> block at 
the end of the page (just before the <code>&lt;/body&gt;</code> 
tag)</li><li>There is limited support for structuring the order of 
initialization</li><li>The mechanism works transparently in both full-page 
render requests (traditional) and partial-page render requests 
(Ajax)</li></ul><p>Despite this, the Tapestry approach can feel very "heavy". 
In a bespoke page, initialization that may affect many elements of the page 
often takes the form of a single event handler, attached 
 to the <code>&lt;body&gt;</code> element, that catches events that bubble up 
from much lower in the DOM. The single handler function identifies the 
applicable elements using CSS selectors, including those that are based on 
HTML5 data- attributes. Additional data- attributes will define additional 
behavior ... for example, a URL for a triggered request. This is "light" 
because:</p><ul><li>There's a single event handler function (rather than a 
unique handler function instance per element)</li><li>The event handler may be 
anonymous (there's no name, or possibility of collision)</li><li>Elements are 
identified by DOM structure and CSS rather than their unique id (the element 
will often not have an id attribute)</li><li>Additional necessary configuration 
is directly attached to the element, rather than split</li><li>As the page is 
dynamically updated, there is no extra "bookkeeping" for added or removed 
elements; new elements inserted into the DOM dynamically are recognized as 
easily as 
 those that were present on the initial render</li></ul><p>By contrast, 
Tapestry is "heavy":</p><ul><li>The initialization function must have a unique 
name</li><li>The element must have a unique id, to it can be located by the 
initialization function</li><li>The event handlers are attached directly to the 
element</li><li>Duplicated elements will have duplicated event 
handlers</li><li>Additional behavior is specified as a JSON object passed to 
the initialization function</li><li>Injecting new elements into the DOM 
requires invoking initialization functions to wire up the necessary event 
handlers</li><li>In (older versions of) Internet Explorer, removing elements 
may leave memory leaks as JavaScript objects retain references to DOM objects 
and vice-versa</li></ul><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-JavaScriptImprovementsfor5.4">JavaScript 
Improvements for 5.4</h1><p>The goals for Tapestry 5.4 are:</p><ul><li>Break 
the dependency on Prototype and allow Tapestry to be used with any client-sid
 e "foundation" framework, seamlessly: minimally, this should include 
jQuery</li><li>Bring Tapestry's JavaScript approach more inline with modern 
practices (the "light" approach described above)</li><li>Let the JavaScript be 
modular, and loaded dynamically and asynchonously, only as 
needed</li><li>Optimize for fast page loads</li><li>Backwards compatibility to 
the Tapestry 5.3 approach until at least 5.5 or 5.6</li><li>Simplify Tapestry's 
client-side behavior, but make it easier to hook into, extend, and 
override</li></ul><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-RequireJS">RequireJS</h2><p>Rather than reinvent the 
wheel, Tapestry should incorporate a proper JavaScript module loader; <a  
class="external-link" href="http://requirejs.org/"; rel="nofollow">RequireJS</a> 
is an excellent candidate, especially considering the new features provided in 
its 2.0.1 release.</p><p>RequireJS supports the <a  class="external-link" 
href="https://github.com/amdjs/amdjs-api/wiki/AMD"; rel="nofollow">AMD (Asynchro
 nous Module Format)</a>, with some additional support for the <a  
class="external-link" href="http://www.commonjs.org/"; 
rel="nofollow">CommonJS</a> module format (the format used by Node.js). The 
latter is simpler, but is designed for a server-side environment; AMD is 
specifically designed to handle asynchronous loading of JavaScript into a web 
browser.</p><p>RequireJS is geared towards bespoke applications; for Tapestry 
it is expected that some of the pathing and other configuration normally done 
in the client using the RequireJS API will instead by handled more dynamically 
on the server, using typically Tapestry configuration and extension mechanisms. 
For example, RequireJS allows mappings of module names to URLs, which is useful 
when working with multiple third-party JavaScript libraries that may be 
organized differently form each other. Tapestry can incorporate such logic on 
the server side instead, making the interface from the browser to the server 
uniform, even when the detai
 ls of where each module is stored is quite variable.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-SlowPageLoadandInitialization">Slow Page Load and 
Initialization</h2><p>Tapestry 5.1 and up has support for dealing with slow 
page loads (especially, slow loads of extenal JavaScript). This is necessary, 
because in slow page load situations, the user may submit a form or click a 
link <em>before</em> page initialization has added an event handler for that 
submit or click; it was common in those cases for the a traditional request to 
be sent to the server for a link or form that was expected by the developer to 
only be accessed via an Ajax request. Without a server-side check (via the 
<code>Request.isXHR()</code> method), the server-side event handler would 
return a response that can not be handled in a traditional request, and the 
user would see the Tapestry exception report page.</p><p>Tapestry 5.3 and 
earlier would wait for the page loaded event (by observing <a  
class="external-link" href="http:
 //api.prototypejs.org/dom/document/observe/" rel="nofollow">Prototype's 
"dom:loaded" event</a>) before executing any JavaScript initialization 
functions. Likewise, in a partial page render (Ajax) update, it would ensure 
that all JavaScript libraries had been loaded before executing any 
initialization functions.</p><p>It is not clear how this same functionality 
will be supported in Tapestry 5.4 as the asynchronous module loading makes it 
difficult to know when all modules have been loaded and all initialization 
functions have been invoked.</p><p>Tapestry 5.4 uses JavaScript to add a "page 
loading mask", which is removed once all JavaScript has initialized. Using CSS 
animation tricks, the mask becomes visible after a fraction of a second, and 
includes a spinning icon. The page loading mask prevents any interaction by the 
user on the incompletely initialized page.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MappingModulestoAssets">Mapping Modules to 
Assets</h2><p>Under RequireJS, modules are ide
 ntified by string that represents a kind of virtual path on the server. The 
path does not start with a scheme, or a slash, or end with a ".js" suffix: in 
all those cases, RequireJS will load a JavaScript file but not treat it as a 
dependency.</p><p>On the server side, Tapestry will map the path to a classpath 
asset.</p><p>There must be provisions for the following options:</p><ul><li>A 
module may be overridden (for instance, to work around a bug), in which case a 
specific asset may be used for the module, rather than the default</li><li>A 
module may need to be converted from one language to another: specifically, a 
module may be written in CoffeeScript, and need to be compiled down to 
JavaScript</li><li>A module's content may be aggregated with other related 
modules (much like a Tapestry 5.3 stack), especially in production. (A request 
for any module should provide the aggregated set of modules; RequireJS will not 
need to send additional requests for the other modules.)</li><li>Modu
 le content (aggregated or not) should be minimized</li></ul><p>In addition, it 
may be reasonable to have Tapestry automatically (or via some configuration) <a 
 class="external-link" href="http://requirejs.org/docs/commonjs.html"; 
rel="nofollow">wrap CommonJS modules as AMD modules</a>. (Traditionally, 
Tapestry has configured this kind of behavior via service contributions, but 
there is ample evidence that this could be done using external configuration, 
perhaps using a JSON file in the module package, to control aggregation, 
wrapping, and other aspects the process. This would be more agile, as it would 
not require restarts when the configuration changes.)</p><p>Modules will be 
stored on the classpath, in a <code>modulejs</code> package below each 
library's root package. Modules within that package are referenced by their 
name relative to the package. (A rarely used feature of Tapestry is that a 
component library name may be mapped to multiple packages; resolving a module 
name may req
 uire a search among the packages. There is the expectation that the developer 
will ensure that there are no duplications that would lead to 
ambiguities.)</p><p>Under this system, module <code>core/pubsub</code> would be 
the file <code>pubsub.js</code> in the package 
<code>org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.modulejs</code>, since Tapestry's component 
library 'core' is mapped to package 
<code>org.apache.tapestry5.corelib</code>.</p><p>Certain key modules, such as 
<a  class="external-link" href="http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/"; 
rel="nofollow">Underscore</a> may be mapped at the root level, as they are used 
so often.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtensionstoJavaScriptSupport">Extensions to 
JavaScriptSupport</h2><p>A number of new methods will be added to 
JavaScriptSupport, to support the following behaviors:</p><ul><li>require one 
or more modules</li><li>require a module (that exports a single function) and 
invoke the function, passing zero or more values. (Values passed to m
 odule functions may be limited to String and <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/json/JSONObject.html";>JSONObject</a>.)</li><li>require
 a module and a function name and invoke named function exported by the module, 
passing zero or more values</li></ul><p>The intent here is to support shifting 
of client-side behavior from the 5.3 style, an approach that involved 
monkey-patching functions onto <code>T5.initializers</code>, and move the same 
logic into modules, preferably with simpler parameters. It is also expected 
that there will be greater use of <code>data-</code> prefixed HTML5 attributes 
in place of separate configuration, as outlined above.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-AvoidingJavaScriptClasses"><span style="line-height: 
1.5;">Avoiding JavaScript Classes</span></h2><p>Much of the logic for important 
operations, such as client-side validation (and input field decoration), are 
based on the use of client-side <a  clas
 s="external-link" href="http://api.prototypejs.org/language/Class/"; 
rel="nofollow">JavaScript classes</a>. This has been somewhat valuable in terms 
of making the behavior controllable via monkey patching. On the other hand, it 
cam be clumsy to accomplish in practice, as the desired behavior is only 
described in terms of the implementation.</p><p>In addition, these JavaScript 
class instances are yet more memory for the browser to manage.</p><p>By using a 
fine-grained set of PubSub messages, the logic usually bundled into a single 
JavaScript class can be assembled (and, in theory, replaced) more easily. In 
addition, Tapestry can do less. For instance, rather than monkey-patching the 
<code>Tapestry.ZoneManager</code> class to enable new behavior when a Zone 
element is updated, relying on a PubSub message to learn when the Zone was 
updated, and perform the desired updates or animations there.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExposeGlobalMessageCatalogtoClient">Expose Global 
Message Cat
 alog to Client</h2><p>Tapestry currently maintains two global message 
catalogs; a global server-side catalog (usually named 
<code>WEB-INF/app.properties) and a client-side catalog. (app.properties 
provides application-specific messages, and overrides of other messages 
provided by Tapestry and other third-party libraries. The global message 
catalog is actually a composite of all of these sources.) </code>The 
client-side catalog is smaller, more limited, and less 
extensible.</p><p>Allowing the client application to have full access to the 
entire message catalog would make maintaining the catalog simpler, and make it 
easier to keep client-side and server-side messages consistent.</p><p>For 
security purposes, it should be possible to exclude some keys from the message 
catalog exposed to the client. In addition, keys whose values include 
<code>String.format()</code> productions (for example, <code>%s</code>) should 
be excluded, as those productions are meaningless in the client.</p><h2 i
 d="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-PartialPageUpdateResponse">Partial Page Update 
Response</h2><p>A key part of Tapestry's dynamic behavior has been the partial 
page update; a specific JSON reply to Ajax requests (usually initiated via a 
Zone component).</p><p>The format and behavior of the response has evolved from 
release to release.</p><p>When an Ajax request is processed by the server, the 
response should handle any of a number of outcomes:</p><ul><li>Redirect the 
entire page to a new URL (on the server, or elsewhere)</li><li>A server-side 
error to be presented to the user. (This was greatly enhanced in 5.3 to present 
the full exception report in a pop-up iframe.)</li><li>Update the content of an 
implicit (originating) element; typically the element for the Zone that 
triggered the request</li><li>Update the content of any number of other 
elements (identified by their client-side id)</li><li>Inject new JavaScript 
libraries into the page</li><li>Inject new CSS links into the page</li><li>P
 eform initializations (using <code>T5.initializers</code>) ... but only after 
all content updates have occurred</li></ul><p>The injected JavaScript libraries 
and CSS links will often duplicate libraries and CSS links already present on 
the page; when the page is partially rendered, the server has no way to know 
what full or partial page renders have already occurred. (It might be possible 
for the request to include a list of what's already loaded in the browser, so 
that the server can filter what it sends back; however, given factors such as 
content compression and typical upload vs. download bandwidth, it is almost 
certainly more effective for the browser to send too much, and let the client 
filter out duplicates.)</p><p>Tapestry 5.3 first loads any additional 
JavaScript (usually by adding new <code>&lt;script&gt;</code> tags to the 
page). Once JavaScript libraries and CSS links have been added, and JavaScript 
libraries have been loaded, the DOM is updated with the new content. Las
 tly, any initializations are processed.</p><p>For Tapestry 5.4, a number of 
changes are planned:</p><ul><li>Tapestry 5.3 style initializations will be a 
specific application of 5.4 style module requirement and invocation</li><li><a  
class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/InitializationPriority.html#IMMEDIATE";>IMMEDIATE</a>
 may occur before DOM changes</li><li>Module requirement/invocation will occur 
in <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/InitializationPriority.html";>initialization
 priority order</a>; for any single priority, initialization will occur in 
render order. (Technically, in the order of invocations on 
JavaScriptSupport.)</li><li>The response will be embeddable inside other 
JSONObject responses.</li></ul><p>To expand on the last note first; the keys 
that define imported JavaScript and CSS, module requirement and invocation,
  and content update will not be top-level keys of the JSONObject response: 
they will be buried inside a <code>tapestry</code> top-level key. An available 
function will be provided that takes an arbitrary JSONObject, extracts the 
<code>tapestry</code> key and handles it, then invokes a provided callback 
before the module requirement and invocation step. The intent is for requests 
that perform purely data oriented operations, the server-side can not only 
provide a response, but can <em>piggy back</em> client-side updates in the 
response.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MaintainingBackwardsCompatibility">Maintaining 
Backwards Compatibility</h1><p>Backwards compatibility is the greatest 
challenge here; ideally, applications (and third party libraries) that were 
written for Tapestry 5.3 will continue to operate unchanged in Tapestry 
5.4.</p><p>At the same time, much of what Tapestry 5.3 does on the client and 
server should be deprecated (and hopefully, simplified).</p><p>Compatibility 
 mode will be initially enabled, via a <a  href="symbols.html">symbol</a> 
value.</p><p>In compatibility mode, additional client-side JavaScript will be 
loaded to provide the same <code>T5</code> and <code>Tapestry</code> namespaces 
available in Tapestry 5.3.</p><p>The implementations of these namespaces will 
be reconstructed in terms of the new module system. The loading of the 
compatibility layer will occur during full page render.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TwitterBootstrap">Twitter Bootstrap</h1><p>In 
Tapestry 5.3 and earlier, Tapestry automatically includes a default CSS link on 
all pages. This CSS file acts as a partial CSS reset (normalizing the look of 
the application across common browsers), and provides a large number of CSS 
rules that many Tapestry components expect to be present. The CSS rules are all 
given a "t-" (for Tapestry) prefix.</p><p>For Tapestry 5.4, this default CSS 
link will be changed to be the default <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://twitter.gith
 ub.com/bootstrap/" rel="nofollow">Twitter Bootstrap</a>. This will not only 
refresh the Tapestry look and feel, but will provide a better structure for 
customizing the application's look and feel.</p><p>As with today, it will be 
possible to override the location of this CSS file (for example, to use a newer 
version of Bootstrap than is packaged in the application, or an 
application-specific customized version).</p><p>This will entail some changes 
to some components, to make use of reasonable or equivalent Bootstrap CSS 
classes, rather than the Tapestry 5.3 classes.</p><p>Twitter Bootstrap also 
includes a number of jQuery-based plugins; these will be exposed in the module 
system.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ContentDeliveryNetworkIntegration">Content Delivery 
Network Integration</h1><p>Tapestry 5.3 has limited ability to integrate into a 
<a  class="external-link" 
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network"; 
rel="nofollow">content delivery network</a>; it can dyna
 mically rewrite URLs for assets (including JavaScript libraries, CSS files, 
image files, etc.). However, it assumes that the CDN can "pull" the content, as 
needed, from the live site.</p><p>A desirable feature would be request URL that 
would produce a JSON-formatted report of all assets that should be mirrored by 
the CDN: this would include all files that might be exposed to the browser, 
including virtual assets (such as JavaScript stacks, aggregated modules, and so 
forth). This could be leveraged by a tool that would use this information to 
extract the assets from the live application and exported to the 
CDN.</p><p>Determining what assets are available is somewhat problematic as 
Tapestry mixes server-side only resources (.class files, .tml files, etc.) 
freely with assets that might be exposed to the browser. (This should never 
have been the case, but that's hindsight.) Some of those server-side resource 
may expose details, such as other server hosts and potentially user names and p
 asswords, that should never be exposed to the client.</p><p>In addition, a 
"walk" of the classpath to locate potential exportable assets can be quite 
expensive (though not considerably more so than what Tapestry already does at 
startup to identify page and component classes).</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtJSCompatibility">ExtJS Compatibility</h1><p>To be 
determined. ExtJS inlcudes it own system for dynamically loading ExtJS modules, 
as well as expressing dependencies between them. Its capabilities overlap what 
RequireJS offers. It would be nice if, in an ExtJS application, the ExtJS 
loader could be used instead of RequireJS, or at least, ensure that they do not 
interfere with each other.</p><h1 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MoreThoughts">More 
Thoughts</h1><p>This is a big undertaking; this document is not a contract, and 
is certainly not complete, but is only starting point for discussions about 
what will be forthcoming in Tapestry 5.4.</p></div>
+</div><h1 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryandJavaScript">Tapestry and 
JavaScript</h1><p>Tapestry 5 has had a interesting mix of 
characteristics.</p><p>On the one hand, it has had a large number of features 
that work, and work well, right out of the box, with no special configuration 
or setup. This includes client-side validation, dynamic content updates, simple 
animations, progressive enhancement, and other standard Ajax and DHTML use 
cases.</p><p>In addition, Tapestry has evolved, from Tapestry 5.0 through 5.3, 
into a quite capable <em>provisioning</em> framework:</p><ul><li>JavaScript 
libraries may be combined into <em>stacks</em> that are combined (in 
production) into a single virtual file</li><li>JavaScript libraries and CSS 
files may be minified</li><li>Libraries, stacks, and other resources are 
exposed to the browser with a versioned URL and far-future expires header, to 
support aggressive client-caching</li><li>Resources, including JavaScript and 
CSS, can be distributed in
 side JARs (as part of reusable component libraries)</li><li>Compressible 
resources will be automatically GZip compressed if the client supports 
it</li></ul><p>However, JavaScript support in Tapestry is still unsatisfactory. 
Too often, Tapestry falls into an <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley"; rel="nofollow">uncanny 
valley</a> where the framework (server-side and client-side) does so much 
automatically that it becomes accepted that it does everything ... developers 
later discover, to their dismay, that the last 10% of custom behavior they 
desire is very hard to implement, because of all the common problems that 
plague any complex system: insufficient APIs, unexpected leaky abstractions, or 
just plain bugs.</p><p>Common examples of the challenges imposed by Tapestry 
include implementing a Confirm mixin, customizing behavior when a Zone 
component is dynamically updated, or any number of issues related to Forms, 
form elements, and Ajax updates.</
 p><p>This document is a roadmap for how Tapestry 5.4 will revisit the 
relationship between server-side Java and client-side JavaScript. Ultimately, 
we hope to convert this relationship from an obstacle to using Tapestry into an 
essential reason to select Tapestry in the first place.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TapestryJavaScriptLimitations(through5.3)">Tapestry 
JavaScript Limitations (through 5.3)</h1><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-DependenceonPrototype/Scriptaculous">Dependence on 
Prototype/Scriptaculous</h2><p>Tapestry made an early choice to embrace 
Prototype and Scriptaculous at a time when this made sense, circa 
2006-2007.</p><p>The goal was to have Tapestry provide a client-side API, the 
<code>Tapestry</code> namespace, that in turn would delegate complex behaviors 
(including DOM element selection, event management, and XmlHttpRequest 
processing) to a <em>foundational framework</em>. The goal was to isolate all 
the direct dependencies on Prototype in such a way that it w
 ould be possible, in the future, to swap out for a different foundational 
framework, such as jQuery or ExtJS. Unfortunately, expediency has proven to 
make this goal even less reachable!</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofDocumentation">Lack of 
Documentation</h2><p>There has not, to date, been an adequate documentation of 
the <code>T5</code> and <code>Tapestry</code> namespaces, beyond the code 
itself.</p><h2 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-LackofModuleStructure">Lack of Module 
Structure</h2><p>Beyond the basic use of namespaces, Tapestry has not embraced 
modern JavaScript usage; specifically, it makes limited use of <em>hygenic 
functions</em> to form modules. Hygenic functions are JavaScript functions that 
exist as a way to encapsulate private properties and functions. Tapestry 5.3 
makes more use of this pattern than previous releases.</p><p>What modularity is 
present in the JavaScript is organized around the <code>T5.initializers</code> 
(<code>Tapestry.Initializers</code>) namespac
 e, and the mechanics of full-page and partial-page renders (described more 
fully below).</p><h2 id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ComplexInitialization">Complex 
Initialization</h2><p>Many users are perplexed by how Tapestry performs 
initialization. In typical web page construction, the developer would create a 
<code>&lt;script&gt;</code> block at the bottom of the page, and do 
initializations there. In Tapestry, it can be much more complex:</p><ul><li>A 
JavaScript library, containing one or more <em>initialization functions</em>, 
is created</li><li>The initialization functions must be <a  
class="external-link" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patching"; 
rel="nofollow">monkey patched</a> into the T5.initializers (or older 
Tapestry.Initializers) namespace.</li><li>The <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/JavaScriptSupport.html";>JavaScriptSupport</a>
 environmental must be used to invoke the function, by nam
 e, passing it a JSONObject to configure itself (the 
"specification")</li><li>The affected element must have a unique id attribute, 
used to coordinate the initialization in the client web browser. (Tapestry 
assists with unique id allocation, but it would be much better if unique ids 
were not necessary.)</li></ul><p>This often feels like overkill, but it is 
necessary for a number of desirable characteristics:</p><ul><li>Initialization 
code occurs in a single Tapestry-generated <code>&lt;script&gt;</code> block at 
the end of the page (just before the <code>&lt;/body&gt;</code> 
tag)</li><li>There is limited support for structuring the order of 
initialization</li><li>The mechanism works transparently in both full-page 
render requests (traditional) and partial-page render requests 
(Ajax)</li></ul><p>Despite this, the Tapestry approach can feel very "heavy". 
In a bespoke page, initialization that may affect many elements of the page 
often takes the form of a single event handler, attached 
 to the <code>&lt;body&gt;</code> element, that catches events that bubble up 
from much lower in the DOM. The single handler function identifies the 
applicable elements using CSS selectors, including those that are based on 
HTML5 data- attributes. Additional data- attributes will define additional 
behavior ... for example, a URL for a triggered request. This is "light" 
because:</p><ul><li>There's a single event handler function (rather than a 
unique handler function instance per element)</li><li>The event handler may be 
anonymous (there's no name, or possibility of collision)</li><li>Elements are 
identified by DOM structure and CSS rather than their unique id (the element 
will often not have an id attribute)</li><li>Additional necessary configuration 
is directly attached to the element, rather than split</li><li>As the page is 
dynamically updated, there is no extra "bookkeeping" for added or removed 
elements; new elements inserted into the DOM dynamically are recognized as 
easily as 
 those that were present on the initial render</li></ul><p>By contrast, 
Tapestry is "heavy":</p><ul><li>The initialization function must have a unique 
name</li><li>The element must have a unique id, to it can be located by the 
initialization function</li><li>The event handlers are attached directly to the 
element</li><li>Duplicated elements will have duplicated event 
handlers</li><li>Additional behavior is specified as a JSON object passed to 
the initialization function</li><li>Injecting new elements into the DOM 
requires invoking initialization functions to wire up the necessary event 
handlers</li><li>In (older versions of) Internet Explorer, removing elements 
may leave memory leaks as JavaScript objects retain references to DOM objects 
and vice-versa</li></ul><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-JavaScriptImprovementsfor5.4">JavaScript 
Improvements for 5.4</h1><p>The goals for Tapestry 5.4 are:</p><ul><li>Break 
the dependency on Prototype and allow Tapestry to be used with any client-sid
 e "foundation" framework, seamlessly: minimally, this should include 
jQuery</li><li>Bring Tapestry's JavaScript approach more inline with modern 
practices (the "light" approach described above)</li><li>Let the JavaScript be 
modular, and loaded dynamically and asynchonously, only as 
needed</li><li>Optimize for fast page loads</li><li>Backwards compatibility to 
the Tapestry 5.3 approach until at least 5.5 or 5.6</li><li>Simplify Tapestry's 
client-side behavior, but make it easier to hook into, extend, and 
override</li></ul><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-RequireJS">RequireJS</h2><p>Rather than reinvent the 
wheel, Tapestry should incorporate a proper JavaScript module loader; <a  
class="external-link" href="http://requirejs.org/"; rel="nofollow">RequireJS</a> 
is an excellent candidate, especially considering the new features provided in 
its 2.0.1 release.</p><p>RequireJS supports the <a  class="external-link" 
href="https://github.com/amdjs/amdjs-api/wiki/AMD"; rel="nofollow">AMD (Asynchro
 nous Module Format)</a>, with some additional support for the <a  
class="external-link" href="http://www.commonjs.org/"; 
rel="nofollow">CommonJS</a> module format (the format used by Node.js). The 
latter is simpler, but is designed for a server-side environment; AMD is 
specifically designed to handle asynchronous loading of JavaScript into a web 
browser.</p><p>RequireJS is geared towards bespoke applications; for Tapestry 
it is expected that some of the pathing and other configuration normally done 
in the client using the RequireJS API will instead by handled more dynamically 
on the server, using typically Tapestry configuration and extension mechanisms. 
For example, RequireJS allows mappings of module names to URLs, which is useful 
when working with multiple third-party JavaScript libraries that may be 
organized differently form each other. Tapestry can incorporate such logic on 
the server side instead, making the interface from the browser to the server 
uniform, even when the detai
 ls of where each module is stored is quite variable.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-SlowPageLoadandInitialization">Slow Page Load and 
Initialization</h2><p>Tapestry 5.1 and up has support for dealing with slow 
page loads (especially, slow loads of extenal JavaScript). This is necessary, 
because in slow page load situations, the user may submit a form or click a 
link <em>before</em> page initialization has added an event handler for that 
submit or click; it was common in those cases for the a traditional request to 
be sent to the server for a link or form that was expected by the developer to 
only be accessed via an Ajax request. Without a server-side check (via the 
<code>Request.isXHR()</code> method), the server-side event handler would 
return a response that can not be handled in a traditional request, and the 
user would see the Tapestry exception report page.</p><p>Tapestry 5.3 and 
earlier would wait for the page loaded event (by observing <a  
class="external-link" href="http:
 //api.prototypejs.org/dom/document/observe/" rel="nofollow">Prototype's 
"dom:loaded" event</a>) before executing any JavaScript initialization 
functions. Likewise, in a partial page render (Ajax) update, it would ensure 
that all JavaScript libraries had been loaded before executing any 
initialization functions.</p><p>It is not clear how this same functionality 
will be supported in Tapestry 5.4 as the asynchronous module loading makes it 
difficult to know when all modules have been loaded and all initialization 
functions have been invoked.</p><p>Tapestry 5.4 uses JavaScript to add a "page 
loading mask", which is removed once all JavaScript has initialized. Using CSS 
animation tricks, the mask becomes visible after a fraction of a second, and 
includes a spinning icon. The page loading mask prevents any interaction by the 
user on the incompletely initialized page.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MappingModulestoAssets">Mapping Modules to 
Assets</h2><p>Under RequireJS, modules are ide
 ntified by string that represents a kind of virtual path on the server. The 
path does not start with a scheme, or a slash, or end with a ".js" suffix: in 
all those cases, RequireJS will load a JavaScript file but not treat it as a 
dependency.</p><p>On the server side, Tapestry will map the path to a classpath 
asset.</p><p>There must be provisions for the following options:</p><ul><li>A 
module may be overridden (for instance, to work around a bug), in which case a 
specific asset may be used for the module, rather than the default</li><li>A 
module may need to be converted from one language to another: specifically, a 
module may be written in CoffeeScript, and need to be compiled down to 
JavaScript</li><li>A module's content may be aggregated with other related 
modules (much like a Tapestry 5.3 stack), especially in production. (A request 
for any module should provide the aggregated set of modules; RequireJS will not 
need to send additional requests for the other modules.)</li><li>Modu
 le content (aggregated or not) should be minimized</li></ul><p>In addition, it 
may be reasonable to have Tapestry automatically (or via some configuration) <a 
 class="external-link" href="http://requirejs.org/docs/commonjs.html"; 
rel="nofollow">wrap CommonJS modules as AMD modules</a>. (Traditionally, 
Tapestry has configured this kind of behavior via service contributions, but 
there is ample evidence that this could be done using external configuration, 
perhaps using a JSON file in the module package, to control aggregation, 
wrapping, and other aspects the process. This would be more agile, as it would 
not require restarts when the configuration changes.)</p><p>Modules will be 
stored on the classpath, in a <code>modulejs</code> package below each 
library's root package. Modules within that package are referenced by their 
name relative to the package. (A rarely used feature of Tapestry is that a 
component library name may be mapped to multiple packages; resolving a module 
name may req
 uire a search among the packages. There is the expectation that the developer 
will ensure that there are no duplications that would lead to 
ambiguities.)</p><p>Under this system, module <code>core/pubsub</code> would be 
the file <code>pubsub.js</code> in the package 
<code>org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.modulejs</code>, since Tapestry's component 
library 'core' is mapped to package 
<code>org.apache.tapestry5.corelib</code>.</p><p>Certain key modules, such as 
<a  class="external-link" href="http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/"; 
rel="nofollow">Underscore</a> may be mapped at the root level, as they are used 
so often.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtensionstoJavaScriptSupport">Extensions to 
JavaScriptSupport</h2><p>A number of new methods will be added to 
JavaScriptSupport, to support the following behaviors:</p><ul><li>require one 
or more modules</li><li>require a module (that exports a single function) and 
invoke the function, passing zero or more values. (Values passed to m
 odule functions may be limited to String and <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/json/JSONObject.html";>JSONObject</a>.)</li><li>require
 a module and a function name and invoke named function exported by the module, 
passing zero or more values</li></ul><p>The intent here is to support shifting 
of client-side behavior from the 5.3 style, an approach that involved 
monkey-patching functions onto <code>T5.initializers</code>, and move the same 
logic into modules, preferably with simpler parameters. It is also expected 
that there will be greater use of <code>data-</code> prefixed HTML5 attributes 
in place of separate configuration, as outlined above.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-AvoidingJavaScriptClasses"><span>Avoiding JavaScript 
Classes</span></h2><p>Much of the logic for important operations, such as 
client-side validation (and input field decoration), are based on the use of 
client-side <a  class="external-link" href="ht
 tp://api.prototypejs.org/language/Class/" rel="nofollow">JavaScript 
classes</a>. This has been somewhat valuable in terms of making the behavior 
controllable via monkey patching. On the other hand, it cam be clumsy to 
accomplish in practice, as the desired behavior is only described in terms of 
the implementation.</p><p>In addition, these JavaScript class instances are yet 
more memory for the browser to manage.</p><p>By using a fine-grained set of 
PubSub messages, the logic usually bundled into a single JavaScript class can 
be assembled (and, in theory, replaced) more easily. In addition, Tapestry can 
do less. For instance, rather than monkey-patching the 
<code>Tapestry.ZoneManager</code> class to enable new behavior when a Zone 
element is updated, relying on a PubSub message to learn when the Zone was 
updated, and perform the desired updates or animations there.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExposeGlobalMessageCatalogtoClient">Expose Global 
Message Catalog to Client</h2><p>Tape
 stry currently maintains two global message catalogs; a global server-side 
catalog (usually named <code>WEB-INF/app.properties)
+ and a client-side catalog. (app.properties provides 
+application-specific messages, and overrides of other messages provided 
+by Tapestry and other third-party libraries. The global message catalog 
+is actually a composite of all of these sources.) </code>The client-side 
catalog is smaller, more limited, and less extensible.</p><p>Allowing the 
client application to have full access to the entire message catalog would make 
maintaining the catalog simpler, and make it easier to keep client-side and 
server-side messages consistent.</p><p>For security purposes, it should be 
possible to exclude some keys from the message catalog exposed to the client. 
In addition, keys whose values include <code>String.format()</code> productions 
(for example, <code>%s</code>) should be excluded, as those productions are 
meaningless in the client.</p><h2 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-PartialPageUpdateResponse">Partial Page Update 
Response</h2><p>A key part of Tapestry's dynamic behavior has been the partial 
page update; a specific JSON reply to Ajax requests (usually initiated via a 
Zone component).</p><p>The format and behavior of the response has evolved from 
release to release.</p><p>When an Ajax re
 quest is processed by the server, the response should handle any of a number 
of outcomes:</p><ul><li>Redirect the entire page to a new URL (on the server, 
or elsewhere)</li><li>A server-side error to be presented to the user. (This 
was greatly enhanced in 5.3 to present the full exception report in a pop-up 
iframe.)</li><li>Update the content of an implicit (originating) element; 
typically the element for the Zone that triggered the request</li><li>Update 
the content of any number of other elements (identified by their client-side 
id)</li><li>Inject new JavaScript libraries into the page</li><li>Inject new 
CSS links into the page</li><li>Peform initializations (using 
<code>T5.initializers</code>) ... but only after all content updates have 
occurred</li></ul><p>The injected JavaScript libraries and CSS links will often 
duplicate libraries and CSS links already present on the page; when the page is 
partially rendered, the server has no way to know what full or partial page 
renders hav
 e already occurred. (It might be possible for the request to include a list of 
what's already loaded in the browser, so that the server can filter what it 
sends back; however, given factors such as content compression and typical 
upload vs. download bandwidth, it is almost certainly more effective for the 
browser to send too much, and let the client filter out 
duplicates.)</p><p>Tapestry 5.3 first loads any additional JavaScript (usually 
by adding new <code>&lt;script&gt;</code> tags to the page). Once JavaScript 
libraries and CSS links have been added, and JavaScript libraries have been 
loaded, the DOM is updated with the new content. Lastly, any initializations 
are processed.</p><p>For Tapestry 5.4, a number of changes are 
planned:</p><ul><li>Tapestry 5.3 style initializations will be a specific 
application of 5.4 style module requirement and invocation</li><li><a  
class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/Initi
 alizationPriority.html#IMMEDIATE">IMMEDIATE</a> may occur before DOM 
changes</li><li>Module requirement/invocation will occur in <a  
class="external-link" 
href="http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/javascript/InitializationPriority.html";>initialization
 priority order</a>; for any single priority, initialization will occur in 
render order. (Technically, in the order of invocations on 
JavaScriptSupport.)</li><li>The response will be embeddable inside other 
JSONObject responses.</li></ul><p>To expand on the last note first; the keys 
that define imported JavaScript and CSS, module requirement and invocation, and 
content update will not be top-level keys of the JSONObject response: they will 
be buried inside a <code>tapestry</code> top-level key. An available function 
will be provided that takes an arbitrary JSONObject, extracts the 
<code>tapestry</code> key and handles it, then invokes a provided callback 
before the module requirement and invocation s
 tep. The intent is for requests that perform purely data oriented operations, 
the server-side can not only provide a response, but can <em>piggy back</em> 
client-side updates in the response.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MaintainingBackwardsCompatibility">Maintaining 
Backwards Compatibility</h1><p>Backwards compatibility is the greatest 
challenge here; ideally, applications (and third party libraries) that were 
written for Tapestry 5.3 will continue to operate unchanged in Tapestry 
5.4.</p><p>At the same time, much of what Tapestry 5.3 does on the client and 
server should be deprecated (and hopefully, simplified).</p><p>Compatibility 
mode will be initially enabled, via a <a  
href="javascript-rewrite-in-54.html">symbol</a> value.</p><p>In compatibility 
mode, additional client-side JavaScript will be loaded to provide the same 
<code>T5</code> and <code>Tapestry</code> namespaces available in Tapestry 
5.3.</p><p>The implementations of these namespaces will be reconstructed in term
 s of the new module system. The loading of the compatibility layer will occur 
during full page render.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-TwitterBootstrap">Twitter Bootstrap</h1><p>In 
Tapestry 5.3 and earlier, Tapestry automatically includes a default CSS link on 
all pages. This CSS file acts as a partial CSS reset (normalizing the look of 
the application across common browsers), and provides a large number of CSS 
rules that many Tapestry components expect to be present. The CSS rules are all 
given a "t-" (for Tapestry) prefix.</p><p>For Tapestry 5.4, this default CSS 
link will be changed to be the default <a  class="external-link" 
href="http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/"; rel="nofollow">Twitter 
Bootstrap</a>. This will not only refresh the Tapestry look and feel, but will 
provide a better structure for customizing the application's look and 
feel.</p><p>As with today, it will be possible to override the location of this 
CSS file (for example, to use a newer version of Bootstrap tha
 n is packaged in the application, or an application-specific customized 
version).</p><p>This will entail some changes to some components, to make use 
of reasonable or equivalent Bootstrap CSS classes, rather than the Tapestry 5.3 
classes.</p><p>Twitter Bootstrap also includes a number of jQuery-based 
plugins; these will be exposed in the module system.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ContentDeliveryNetworkIntegration">Content Delivery 
Network Integration</h1><p>Tapestry 5.3 has limited ability to integrate into a 
<a  class="external-link" 
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network"; 
rel="nofollow">content delivery network</a>; it can dynamically rewrite URLs 
for assets (including JavaScript libraries, CSS files, image files, etc.). 
However, it assumes that the CDN can "pull" the content, as needed, from the 
live site.</p><p>A desirable feature would be request URL that would produce a 
JSON-formatted report of all assets that should be mirrored by the CDN: this 
woul
 d include all files that might be exposed to the browser, including virtual 
assets (such as JavaScript stacks, aggregated modules, and so forth). This 
could be leveraged by a tool that would use this information to extract the 
assets from the live application and exported to the CDN.</p><p>Determining 
what assets are available is somewhat problematic as Tapestry mixes server-side 
only resources (.class files, .tml files, etc.) freely with assets that might 
be exposed to the browser. (This should never have been the case, but that's 
hindsight.) Some of those server-side resource may expose details, such as 
other server hosts and potentially user names and passwords, that should never 
be exposed to the client.</p><p>In addition, a "walk" of the classpath to 
locate potential exportable assets can be quite expensive (though not 
considerably more so than what Tapestry already does at startup to identify 
page and component classes).</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-ExtJSCompatibility">Ex
 tJS Compatibility</h1><p>To be determined. ExtJS inlcudes it own system for 
dynamically loading ExtJS modules, as well as expressing dependencies between 
them. Its capabilities overlap what RequireJS offers. It would be nice if, in 
an ExtJS application, the ExtJS loader could be used instead of RequireJS, or 
at least, ensure that they do not interfere with each other.</p><h1 
id="JavaScriptRewritein5.4-MoreThoughts">More Thoughts</h1><p>This is a big 
undertaking; this document is not a contract, and is certainly not complete, 
but is only starting point for discussions about what will be forthcoming in 
Tapestry 5.4.</p></div>
       </div>
 
       <div class="clearer"></div>

Modified: websites/production/tapestry/content/limitations.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/production/tapestry/content/limitations.html (original)
+++ websites/production/tapestry/content/limitations.html Sat Feb  3 18:21:36 
2018
@@ -27,6 +27,16 @@
       </title>
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/resources/space.css" />
 
+          <link href='/resources/highlighter/styles/shCoreCXF.css' 
rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' />
+    <link href='/resources/highlighter/styles/shThemeCXF.css' rel='stylesheet' 
type='text/css' />
+    <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shCore.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushJava.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushXml.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushPlain.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+        <script>
+      SyntaxHighlighter.defaults['toolbar'] = false;
+      SyntaxHighlighter.all();
+    </script>
   
   <link href="/styles/style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
 
@@ -67,7 +77,8 @@
       </div>
 
       <div id="content">
-                <div 
id="ConfluenceContent"><plain-text-body>{scrollbar}</plain-text-body><h2 
id="Limitations-Limitations">Limitations</h2><h3 
id="Limitations-HowdoIaddnewcomponentstoanexistingpagedynamically?">How do I 
add new components to an existing page dynamically?</h3><p>The short answer 
here is: <strong>you don't</strong>. The long answer here is <strong>you don't 
have to, to get the behavior you desire</strong>.</p><p>One of Tapestry basic 
values is high scalability: this is expressed in a number of ways, reflecting 
scalability concerns within a single server, and within a cluster of 
servers.</p><p>Although you code Tapestry pages and components as if they were 
ordinary POJOs (<span style="line-height: 1.4285715;">Plain Old Java Objects -- 
Tapestry does not require you to extend any base classes or implement any 
special interfaces)</span><span style="line-height: 1.4285715;">, as deployed 
by Tapestry they are closer to a traditional servlet: a single instance of each 
page s
 ervices requests from multiple threads. Behind the scenes, Tapestry transforms 
you code, rewriting it on the fly.</span></p><p>What this means is that 
<em>any</em> incoming request must be handled by a <em>single page 
instance</em>. Therefore, Tapestry enforces the concept of <strong>static 
structure, dynamic behavior</strong>.</p><p>Tapestry provides quite a number of 
ways to vary what content is rendered, well beyond simple conditionals and 
loops. It is possible to "drag in" components from other pages when rendering a 
page (other FAQs will expand on this concept). The point is, that although a 
Tapestry page's structure is very rigid, the order in which the components of 
the page render does not have to be top to bottom.</p><h3 
id="Limitations-Whydoesn'tmyserviceimplementationreloadwhenIchangeit?">Why 
doesn't my service implementation reload when I change it?</h3><p>Main article: 
<a  href="service-implementation-reloading.html">Service Implementation 
Reloading</a></p><p>Live servi
 ce reloading has some limitations:</p><ul><li>The service must define a 
service interface.</li><li>The service implementation must be on the file 
system (not inside a JAR).</li><li>The implementation must be instantiated by 
Tapestry, not inside code (even code inside a module class).</li><li>The 
service must use the default <a  
href="defining-tapestry-ioc-services.html">scope</a> (reloading of perthread 
scopes is not supported).</li></ul><p>Consider the following example 
module:</p><parameter ac:name="controls">true</parameter><parameter 
ac:name="linenumbers">true</parameter><plain-text-body>public static void 
bind(ServiceBinder binder)
+                <div id="ConfluenceContent"><h2 
id="Limitations-Limitations">Limitations</h2><h3 
id="Limitations-HowdoIaddnewcomponentstoanexistingpagedynamically?">How do I 
add new components to an existing page dynamically?</h3><p>The short answer 
here is: <strong>you don't</strong>. The long answer here is <strong>you don't 
have to, to get the behavior you desire</strong>.</p><p>One of Tapestry basic 
values is high scalability: this is expressed in a number of ways, reflecting 
scalability concerns within a single server, and within a cluster of 
servers.</p><p>Although you code Tapestry pages and components as if they were 
ordinary POJOs (<span>Plain Old Java Objects -- Tapestry does not require you 
to extend any base classes or implement any special interfaces)</span><span>, 
as deployed by Tapestry they are closer to a traditional servlet: a single 
instance of each page services requests from multiple threads. Behind the 
scenes, Tapestry transforms you code, rewriting it on the f
 ly.</span></p><p>What this means is that <em>any</em> incoming request must be 
handled by a <em>single page instance</em>. Therefore, Tapestry enforces the 
concept of <strong>static structure, dynamic behavior</strong>.</p><p>Tapestry 
provides quite a number of ways to vary what content is rendered, well beyond 
simple conditionals and loops. It is possible to "drag in" components from 
other pages when rendering a page (other FAQs will expand on this concept). The 
point is, that although a Tapestry page's structure is very rigid, the order in 
which the components of the page render does not have to be top to 
bottom.</p><h3 
id="Limitations-Whydoesn'tmyserviceimplementationreloadwhenIchangeit?">Why 
doesn't my service implementation reload when I change it?</h3><p>Main article: 
<a  href="limitations.html">Limitations</a></p><p>Live service reloading has 
some limitations:</p><ul><li>The service must define a service 
interface.</li><li>The service implementation must be on the file system
  (not inside a JAR).</li><li>The implementation must be instantiated by 
Tapestry, not inside code (even code inside a module class).</li><li>The 
service must use the default <a  href="limitations.html">scope</a> (reloading 
of perthread scopes is not supported).</li></ul><p>Consider the following 
example module:</p><div class="code panel pdl" style="border-width: 1px;"><div 
class="codeContent panelContent pdl">
+<pre class="brush: java; gutter: true; theme: Default" 
style="font-size:12px;">public static void bind(ServiceBinder binder)
 {
   binder.bind(ArchiveService.class, ArchiveServiceImpl.class);
 }
@@ -80,7 +91,8 @@ public static JobQueue buildJobQueue(Mes
  
   return service;
 }
-</plain-text-body><p>ArchiveService is reloadable, because Tapestry 
instantiates <code>ArchiveServiceImpl</code> itself. On the other hand, 
Tapestry invokes <code>buildJobQueue()</code> and it is your code inside the 
method that instantiates <code>JobQueueImpl</code>, so the JobQueue service 
will not be reloadable.</p><p>Finally, only classes whose class files are 
stored directly on the file system, and not packaged inside JARs, are ever 
reloadable ... generally, only the services of the application being built (and 
not services from libraries) will be stored on the file system. This reflects 
the intent of reloading: as an agile development tool, but not something to be 
used in deployment.</p><h3 
id="Limitations-HowdoIrunmultipleTapestryapplicationsinthesamewebapplication?">How
 do I run multiple Tapestry applications in the same web 
application?</h3><p>Running multiple Tapestry 5 applications is not supported; 
there's only one place to identify the application root package, so even 
 configuring multiple filters into multiple folders will not 
work.</p><p>Support for multiple Tapestry applications in the same web 
application was a specific non-goal in Tapestry 5 (it needlessly complicated 
Tapestry 4). Given how loosely connected Tapestry 5 pages are from each other, 
there doesn't seem to be an advantage to doing so ... and certainly, in terms 
of memory utilization, there is a significant down side, were it even 
possible.</p><p>You&#160;<em>can</em>&#160;<span style="color: rgb(0,0,0);">run 
a Tapestry 4 app and a Tapestry 5 app side-by-side (the package names are 
different, for just this reason), but they know nothing of each other, and 
can't interact directly. This is just like the way you could have a single WAR 
with multiple servlets; the different applications can only communicate via 
URLs, or shared state in the 
HttpSession.</span></p><plain-text-body>{scrollbar}</plain-text-body><p>&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p></div>
+</pre>
+</div></div><p>ArchiveService is reloadable, because Tapestry instantiates 
<code>ArchiveServiceImpl</code> itself. On the other hand, Tapestry invokes 
<code>buildJobQueue()</code> and it is your code inside the method that 
instantiates <code>JobQueueImpl</code>, so the JobQueue service will not be 
reloadable.</p><p>Finally, only classes whose class files are stored directly 
on the file system, and not packaged inside JARs, are ever reloadable ... 
generally, only the services of the application being built (and not services 
from libraries) will be stored on the file system. This reflects the intent of 
reloading: as an agile development tool, but not something to be used in 
deployment.</p><h3 
id="Limitations-HowdoIrunmultipleTapestryapplicationsinthesamewebapplication?">How
 do I run multiple Tapestry applications in the same web 
application?</h3><p>Running multiple Tapestry 5 applications is not supported; 
there's only one place to identify the application root package, so even config
 uring multiple filters into multiple folders will not work.</p><p>Support for 
multiple Tapestry applications in the same web application was a specific 
non-goal in Tapestry 5 (it needlessly complicated Tapestry 4). Given how 
loosely connected Tapestry 5 pages are from each other, there doesn't seem to 
be an advantage to doing so ... and certainly, in terms of memory utilization, 
there is a significant down side, were it even 
possible.</p><p>You&#160;<em>can</em>&#160;<span style="color: rgb(0,0,0);">run 
a Tapestry 4 app and a Tapestry 5 app side-by-side (the package names are 
different, for just this reason), but they know nothing of each other, and 
can't interact directly. This is just like the way you could have a single WAR 
with multiple servlets; the different applications can only communicate via 
URLs, or shared state in the 
HttpSession.</span>&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p></div>
       </div>
 
       <div class="clearer"></div>

Modified: websites/production/tapestry/content/maven-support-faq.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/production/tapestry/content/maven-support-faq.html (original)
+++ websites/production/tapestry/content/maven-support-faq.html Sat Feb  3 
18:21:36 2018
@@ -27,6 +27,16 @@
       </title>
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/resources/space.css" />
 
+          <link href='/resources/highlighter/styles/shCoreCXF.css' 
rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' />
+    <link href='/resources/highlighter/styles/shThemeCXF.css' rel='stylesheet' 
type='text/css' />
+    <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shCore.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushJava.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushXml.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+          <script src='/resources/highlighter/scripts/shBrushPlain.js' 
type='text/javascript'></script>
+        <script>
+      SyntaxHighlighter.defaults['toolbar'] = false;
+      SyntaxHighlighter.all();
+    </script>
   
   <link href="/styles/style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
 
@@ -67,7 +77,8 @@
       </div>
 
       <div id="content">
-                <div 
id="ConfluenceContent"><plain-text-body>{scrollbar}</plain-text-body><h2 
id="MavenSupportFAQ-MavenSupport">Maven Support</h2><h3 
id="MavenSupportFAQ-WhydoMavenprojectnamesandotherdetailsshowupinmypages?">Why 
do Maven project names and other details show up in my pages?</h3><p>Tapestry 
and maven both use the same syntax for dynamic portions of files: the 
<code>${...</code>} syntax. When Maven is copying resources from 
<code>src/main/resources</code>, and when filtering is <em>enabled</em> (which 
is not the default), then any expansions in <em>Tapestry templates</em> that 
match against Maven project properties are substituted. If you look at the 
deployed application you'll see that <code>${name</code>} is gone, replaced 
with your project's name!</p><p>The solution is to update your 
<code>pom.xml</code> and ignore any .tml files when copying and 
filtering:</p><parameter ac:name="language">xml</parameter><parameter 
ac:name="title">pom.xml (partial)</parameter><plain
 -text-body>  &lt;resource&gt;
+                <div id="ConfluenceContent"><h2 
id="MavenSupportFAQ-MavenSupport">Maven Support</h2><h3 
id="MavenSupportFAQ-WhydoMavenprojectnamesandotherdetailsshowupinmypages?">Why 
do Maven project names and other details show up in my pages?</h3><p>Tapestry 
and maven both use the same syntax for dynamic portions of files: the 
<code>${...</code>} syntax. When Maven is copying resources from 
<code>src/main/resources</code>, and when filtering is <em>enabled</em> (which 
is not the default), then any expansions in <em>Tapestry templates</em> that 
match against Maven project properties are substituted. If you look at the 
deployed application you'll see that <code>${name</code>} is gone, replaced 
with your project's name!</p><p>The solution is to update your 
<code>pom.xml</code> and ignore any .tml files when copying and 
filtering:</p><div class="code panel pdl" style="border-width: 1px;"><div 
class="codeHeader panelHeader pdl" style="border-bottom-width: 1px;"><b>pom.xml 
(partial)</b>
 </div><div class="codeContent panelContent pdl">
+<pre class="brush: xml; gutter: false; theme: Default" 
style="font-size:12px;">  &lt;resource&gt;
     &lt;directory&gt;src/main/resources&lt;/directory&gt;
     &lt;excludes&gt;
       &lt;exclude&gt;**/*.tml&lt;/exclude&gt;
@@ -82,7 +93,8 @@
     &lt;/includes&gt;
     &lt;filtering&gt;false&lt;/filtering&gt;
   &lt;/resource&gt;
-</plain-text-body><plain-text-body>{scrollbar}</plain-text-body></div>
+</pre>
+</div></div><p></p></div>
       </div>
 
       <div class="clearer"></div>


Reply via email to