Fixed typing in GLV tests that were failing for .NET CTR
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/eab4bce6 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/eab4bce6 Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/eab4bce6 Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1777 Commit: eab4bce69d113adc766f141eb5adcba006ee6398 Parents: 85b7338 Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Authored: Thu Mar 1 09:32:34 2018 -0500 Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> Committed: Thu Mar 1 09:32:34 2018 -0500 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- .../test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs | 2 -- gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/eab4bce6/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs index 7fa9716..0685d89 100644 --- a/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs +++ b/gremlin-dotnet/test/Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest/Gherkin/GherkinTestRunner.cs @@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.IntegrationTest.Gherkin private static readonly IDictionary<string, IgnoreReason> IgnoredScenarios = new Dictionary<string, IgnoreReason> { { "g_V_hasLabelXpersonX_hasXage_notXlteX10X_andXnotXbetweenX11_20XXXX_andXltX29X_orXeqX35XXXX_name", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, // TINKERPOP-1859?? { "g_VX1X_out_aggregateXxX_out_whereXnotXwithinXaXXX", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, // TINKERPOP-1859?? - { "g_withBulkXfalseX_withSackX1_sumX_VX1X_localXoutEXknowsX_barrierXnormSackX_inVX_inXknowsX_barrier_sack", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_withBulkXfalseX_withSackX1_sumX_V_out_barrier_sack", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, - { "g_withSackX1_sumX_VX1X_localXoutXknowsX_barrierXnormSackXX_inXknowsX_barrier_sack", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_V_hasXname_markoX_propertyXfriendWeight_outEXknowsX_weight_sum__acl_privateX", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_unfold_selectXkeysX_unfold", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, { "g_V_outE_weight_groupCount_selectXkeysX_unfold", IgnoreReason.NeedsFurtherInvestigation }, http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/eab4bce6/gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature b/gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature index f5baf64..89e3946 100644 --- a/gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature +++ b/gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Sack.feature @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Feature: Step - sack() When iterated to list Then the result should be unordered | result | - | d[1.0].d | + | d[1.0].m | Scenario: g_withBulkXfalseX_withSackX1_sumX_V_out_barrier_sack Given the modern graph