Fixed a grammar mistake in collections recipe CTR

Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/commit/e1a69fd8
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/tree/e1a69fd8
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/diff/e1a69fd8

Branch: refs/heads/TINKERPOP-1903
Commit: e1a69fd8075f02ae1f22c4195edd956bf988445a
Parents: 42bacaf
Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com>
Authored: Wed Apr 11 08:56:22 2018 -0400
Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com>
Committed: Wed Apr 11 09:05:33 2018 -0400

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop/blob/e1a69fd8/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc 
b/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc
index 61fee99..f44040a 100644
--- a/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc
+++ b/docs/src/recipes/collections.asciidoc
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ g.V().fold().unfold().values('name')
 g.V().store('a').cap('a').unfold().values('name')
 ----
 
-The above examples show that `unfold()` works quite well when you want don't 
want to preserve the `List` structure of
-the traverser as it just flattens `List` traversers to the traversal stream. 
The above examples only have one `List`
-as a result, but consider what happens when there is more than one:
+The above examples show that `unfold()` works quite well when you don't want 
to preserve the `List` structure of the
+traverser as it just flattens `List` traversers to the traversal stream. The 
above examples only have one `List` as a
+result, but consider what happens when there is more than one:
 
 [gremlin-groovy,modern]
 ----

Reply via email to