This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

spmallette pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop.git

commit d2764584ceb1f74c7474b41a2a91d51bae5ce232
Author: Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Oct 7 14:42:46 2021 -0400

    Fixed spelling CTR
---
 docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc 
b/docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc
index f3cfe2d..4606131 100644
--- a/docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc
+++ b/docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ See: 
link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2479[TINKERPOP-2479]
 The `withStrategies()` configuration step accepts a variable number of 
`TraversalStrategy` instances. In Java, those
 instances are typically constructed with `instance()` if it is a singleton or 
by way of a builder pattern which
 provides a fluent, type safe method to create the object. For Groovy, which is 
highly applicable to those who use
-Gremlin scripts in their applications or work a lot within tools similar to 
the Gremlin Cosnole, the builder syntax
+Gremlin scripts in their applications or work a lot within tools similar to 
the Gremlin Console, the builder syntax
 can work but doesn't really match the nature of the Groovy language. Using a 
strategy in this script context would
 look something like:
 

Reply via email to