spmallette commented on a change in pull request #1555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1555#discussion_r797579735
##########
File path: gremlin-test/features/sideEffect/Group.feature
##########
@@ -264,17 +264,17 @@ Feature: Step - group()
| m[{"software":"d[2.0].d", "person":"d[5.0].d"}] |
# The post-ordering really isn't really right but works around TINKERPOP-2600
- Scenario:
g_withSideEffectXa__marko_666_noone_blahX_V_groupXaX_byXnameX_byXoutE_label_foldX_capXaX
- Given the modern graph
- And using the parameter xx1 defined as "m[{\"marko\":[\"666\"],
\"noone\":[\"blah\"]}]"
- And the traversal of
- """
- g.withSideEffect("a",
xx1).V().group("a").by("name").by(__.outE().label().fold()).cap("a").unfold().group().by(keys).by(select(values).order(Scope.local).by(Order.asc))
- """
- When iterated to list
- Then the result should be unordered
- | result |
- | m[{"ripple":[], "peter":["created"], "noone":["blah"], "vadas":[],
"josh":["created", "created"], "lop":[], "marko":["666", "created", "knows",
"knows"]}] |
+# Scenario:
g_withSideEffectXa__marko_666_noone_blahX_V_groupXaX_byXnameX_byXoutE_label_foldX_capXaX
Review comment:
added further context in comments and created:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2699
functionally the Gremlin works fine...the test frameworks just have a
problem asserting the behavior.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
