Cole-Greer commented on PR #3163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3163#issuecomment-3115385849

   VOTE +1. In my opinion the 
[documentation](https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.7.3/reference/#_transaction_semantics)
 has always been explicit regarding what isolation level we guarantee. I'm not 
opposed to adding an extra sentence or 2 stating that non-repeatable reads and 
phantom reads are not covered, but I don't believe it is necessary.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tinkerpop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to