spmallette opened a new pull request, #3685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3685
The console resolves a bare in() step, so the tutorial's claim that in()
must always be written as __.in() was inaccurate. Reframe it as a
recommendation: a bare in() is not guaranteed to resolve to the intended
anonymous traversal step because in overlaps with a Groovy reserved word, so
the explicit __.in() form is preferred for deterministic results and parity
with Java. Also show how to load the modern toy graph and spawn g in the result
iteration section so the console examples can be run without relying on earlier
context.
<!--
Thanks for contributing! Reminders:
+ TARGET the earliest branch where you want the change
3.7-dev -> 3.7.7 (non-breaking only)
3.8-dev -> 3.8.2 (non-breaking only)
master -> 4.0.0
+ Committers will MERGE the PR forward to newer versions
+ ADD entry to the CHANGELOG.asciidoc for the targeted version
Do not reference a JIRA number there
+ ADD JIRA number to title and link in description
+ PRs requires 3 +1s from committers OR
1 +1 and 7 day wait to merge.
+ MORE details: https://s.apache.org/rtnal
-->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
