[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17330363#comment-17330363
]
Pramod commented on TOMEE-3725:
-------------------------------
Thanks. I just downloaded the
[https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.7-SNAPSHOT/]
and quickly did code adaption and tested for public <T extends Principal>
Set<T> getPrincipalsByType(Class<T> pType)
{code:java}
Set<AbstractAuthenticatedUser> customPrincipals =
ctx.getPrincipalsByType(AbstractAuthenticatedUser.class); for
(AbstractAuthenticatedUser customPrincipal : customPrincipals)
{ LOGGER.info("From securityContext-principalByType
:"+customPrincipal.toString());
}
{code}
This worked. So atleast looks promising :)
But ctx.getCallerPrincipal(); does not return updated principal object -
instead it gave generic principal
[TomcatUser: GenericPrincipal[
> Returns invalid principal - Java EE Security - Inject
> javax.security.enterprise.SecurityContext
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOMEE-3725
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3725
> Project: TomEE
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TomEE Core Server
> Affects Versions: 8.0.6
> Reporter: Pramod
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 8.0.6
>
>
> We used apache-tomee-plume-8.0.6 for this issue reproduce.
> We use our own JASPIC implementation for security, which works fine so far.
> It creates a CallerPrincipalCallback with subject and our own
> AuthenticatedUser principal. But if we call in an EJB ctx.getCallerPrincipal
> we get "GenericPrincipal"
> "getCallerPrincipal >[TomcatUser:
> GenericPrincipal[XXXXX(JFOXXXST.administrator,JFOXXXST.users,)]]"
>
> & NOT AuthenticatedUser principal- It seems our REQUIRED principal is not
> propagated correctly from servlet container to EJB container, the same works
> fine in OpenLiberty 21.0.0.X
>
> After spending some more check in security - looks like
> tomee-security-8.0.6.jar has below implementation which is returning empty
> set - is this expected? or future implementation will be provided?
> public Principal getCallerPrincipal()
> {
> return this.securityService.getCallerPrincipal();
> }
> public <T extends Principal> Set<T> getPrincipalsByType(Class<T> pType)
> { return Collections.emptySet(); }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
