[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gwénaël Ruelland updated TOMEE-3846:
------------------------------------
Description:
Website lets us believe that Plus flavor includes Plume flavor. which was the
opposite for previous versions, and, Plume does includes eclipselink and
mojarra, when Plus does not (and never did). now Plus includes batchee which
Plume does not.
These piece of information could be better transmitted to the website visitors.
I had trouble figuring out why my java webapp was starting on Plume but not
Plus. (because eclipselink is not in Plus)
Questions : Is it intended to have Plus not containing Eclipselink while Plume
not containing batchee ?
if yes : update website
if not : update poms
1) Current web site content (partial)
!image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png|width=815,height=95!
[...]
!image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png|width=818,height=68!
2) Actual jars diff between flavors
!image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png|width=817,height=208!
3) Suggested website with 3 tables (listening to your comments)
part (a) synthetic table
part (b) functionalities
part (c) implementations
!image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png|width=1029,height=1926!
5) capture of other attempt
!image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png|width=796,height=591!
6) older attempt
!image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png|width=964,height=1840!
6) capture of much older version
!image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png|width=816,height=597!
was:
Website lets us believe that Plus flavor includes Plume flavor. which was the
opposite for previous versions, and, Plume does includes eclipselink and
mojarra, when Plus does not (and never did). now Plus includes batchee which
Plume does not.
These piece of information could be better transmitted to the website visitors.
I had trouble figuring out why my java webapp was starting on Plume but not
Plus. (because eclipselink is not in Plus)
Questions : Is it intended to have Plus not containing Eclipselink while Plume
not containing batchee ?
if yes : update website
if not : update poms
1) Current web site content (partial)
!image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png|width=815,height=95!
[...]
!image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png|width=818,height=68!
2) Actual jars diff between flavors
!image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png|width=817,height=208!
3) Suggested website with 3 tables (listening to your comments)
part (a) synthetic table
part (b) functionalities
part (c) implementations
!image-2022-03-25-11-19-03-406.png|width=1046,height=1962!
5) capture of other attempt
!image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png|width=796,height=591!
6) older attempt
!image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png|width=964,height=1840!
6) capture of much older version
!image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png|width=816,height=597!
> Inconsistence between tomee flavors comparison in website and actual jars
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOMEE-3846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846
> Project: TomEE
> Issue Type: Documentation
> Components: Website
> Reporter: Gwénaël Ruelland
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png,
> image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png, image-2022-03-02-08-58-10-952.png,
> image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png, image-2022-03-02-09-05-49-069.png,
> image-2022-03-02-09-06-20-365.png, image-2022-03-02-09-10-30-996.png,
> image-2022-03-02-09-11-27-520.png, image-2022-03-02-11-59-07-000.png,
> image-2022-03-02-11-59-41-196.png, image-2022-03-02-12-19-25-319.png,
> image-2022-03-02-12-29-28-417.png, image-2022-03-02-12-54-57-355.png,
> image-2022-03-02-13-12-34-765.png, image-2022-03-03-16-02-35-432.png,
> image-2022-03-03-16-02-39-953.png, image-2022-03-03-16-03-35-130.png,
> image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png, image-2022-03-11-10-45-51-121.png,
> image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png, image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png,
> image-2022-03-25-11-19-03-406.png, image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Website lets us believe that Plus flavor includes Plume flavor. which was the
> opposite for previous versions, and, Plume does includes eclipselink and
> mojarra, when Plus does not (and never did). now Plus includes batchee which
> Plume does not.
> These piece of information could be better transmitted to the website
> visitors.
> I had trouble figuring out why my java webapp was starting on Plume but not
> Plus. (because eclipselink is not in Plus)
> Questions : Is it intended to have Plus not containing Eclipselink while
> Plume not containing batchee ?
> if yes : update website
> if not : update poms
> 1) Current web site content (partial)
> !image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png|width=815,height=95!
> [...]
> !image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png|width=818,height=68!
> 2) Actual jars diff between flavors
> !image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png|width=817,height=208!
> 3) Suggested website with 3 tables (listening to your comments)
> part (a) synthetic table
> part (b) functionalities
> part (c) implementations
> !image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png|width=1029,height=1926!
> 5) capture of other attempt
> !image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png|width=796,height=591!
> 6) older attempt
> !image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png|width=964,height=1840!
> 6) capture of much older version
> !image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png|width=816,height=597!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
