[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846?focusedWorklogId=759102&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-759102
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TOMEE-3846:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 20/Apr/22 10:24
            Start Date: 20/Apr/22 10:24
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: sultan opened a new pull request, #866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/866

   this is the "per-version" comparison page for TomEE v7.1
   
   i have several questions/issues:
   * i lack some JSR specs number, i need to dig them
   * this comparison page would be a quasi duplicate between 7.0 and 7.1, it is 
ok for now.
     * there are 2 TomEE minors (v7.0,v7.1) for 1 Java EE (v7) its ok if it 
stays like that
     * it may be a pain later if there is again 2 TomEE for 1 Jakarta (say 
TomEE v10.0 and TomEE v10.1 for same Jakarta 10.0
     * could this happen ?
   * 




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 759102)
    Time Spent: 5.5h  (was: 5h 20m)

> Inconsistence between tomee flavors comparison in website and actual jars
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOMEE-3846
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846
>             Project: TomEE
>          Issue Type: Documentation
>          Components: Website
>            Reporter: Gwénaël Ruelland
>            Assignee: Gwénaël Ruelland
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 9.0.0-M8, 8.0.11
>
>         Attachments: image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png, image-2022-03-02-08-58-10-952.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png, image-2022-03-02-09-05-49-069.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-06-20-365.png, image-2022-03-02-09-10-30-996.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-11-27-520.png, image-2022-03-02-11-59-07-000.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-11-59-41-196.png, image-2022-03-02-12-19-25-319.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-12-29-28-417.png, image-2022-03-02-12-54-57-355.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-13-12-34-765.png, image-2022-03-03-16-02-35-432.png, 
> image-2022-03-03-16-02-39-953.png, image-2022-03-03-16-03-35-130.png, 
> image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png, image-2022-03-11-10-45-51-121.png, 
> image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png, image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png, 
> image-2022-03-25-11-19-03-406.png, image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png
>
>          Time Spent: 5.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Website lets us believe that Plus flavor includes Plume flavor. which was the 
> opposite for previous versions, and, Plume does includes eclipselink and 
> mojarra, when Plus does not (and never did). now Plus includes batchee which 
> Plume does not.
> These piece of information could be better transmitted to the website 
> visitors.
> I had trouble figuring out why my java webapp was starting on Plume but not 
> Plus. (because eclipselink is not in Plus)
> Questions : Is it intended to have Plus not containing Eclipselink while 
> Plume not containing batchee ?
> if yes : update website
> if not : update poms 
> 1) Current web site content (partial)
> !image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png|width=815,height=95!
>      [...]
> !image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png|width=818,height=68!
> 2) Actual jars diff between flavors
> !image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png|width=817,height=208!
> 3) Suggested website with 3 tables (listening to your comments)
> part (a) synthetic table
> part (b) functionalities
> part (c) implementations
> !image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png|width=1029,height=1926!
> 5) capture of other attempt
> !image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png|width=796,height=591!
> 6) older attempt
> !image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png|width=964,height=1840!
> 6) capture of much older version
> !image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png|width=816,height=597!
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to