[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846?focusedWorklogId=760488&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-760488
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TOMEE-3846:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 21/Apr/22 22:38
            Start Date: 21/Apr/22 22:38
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: dblevins commented on PR #866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/866#issuecomment-1105828226

   @sultan on the spec version questions, some of those are a bit tricky.  For 
example ActiveMQ only implements JMS 1.1, however there is code in TomEE to 
implement some of the JMS 2.0 features.  I don't know if there are any gaps.  
We're not running the JMS TCK so it's hard to say.
   
   Going to merge these comparison PRs and if we need to adjust the versions we 
list, we can do that in separate PRs




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 760488)
    Time Spent: 7h 50m  (was: 7h 40m)

> Inconsistence between tomee flavors comparison in website and actual jars
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOMEE-3846
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3846
>             Project: TomEE
>          Issue Type: Documentation
>          Components: Website
>            Reporter: Gwénaël Ruelland
>            Assignee: Gwénaël Ruelland
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 9.0.0-M8, 8.0.11
>
>         Attachments: image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png, image-2022-03-02-08-58-10-952.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png, image-2022-03-02-09-05-49-069.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-06-20-365.png, image-2022-03-02-09-10-30-996.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-09-11-27-520.png, image-2022-03-02-11-59-07-000.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-11-59-41-196.png, image-2022-03-02-12-19-25-319.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-12-29-28-417.png, image-2022-03-02-12-54-57-355.png, 
> image-2022-03-02-13-12-34-765.png, image-2022-03-03-16-02-35-432.png, 
> image-2022-03-03-16-02-39-953.png, image-2022-03-03-16-03-35-130.png, 
> image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png, image-2022-03-11-10-45-51-121.png, 
> image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png, image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png, 
> image-2022-03-25-11-19-03-406.png, image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png
>
>          Time Spent: 7h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Website lets us believe that Plus flavor includes Plume flavor. which was the 
> opposite for previous versions, and, Plume does includes eclipselink and 
> mojarra, when Plus does not (and never did). now Plus includes batchee which 
> Plume does not.
> These piece of information could be better transmitted to the website 
> visitors.
> I had trouble figuring out why my java webapp was starting on Plume but not 
> Plus. (because eclipselink is not in Plus)
> Questions : Is it intended to have Plus not containing Eclipselink while 
> Plume not containing batchee ?
> if yes : update website
> if not : update poms 
> 1) Current web site content (partial)
> !image-2022-03-02-08-56-58-642.png|width=815,height=95!
>      [...]
> !image-2022-03-02-08-57-19-856.png|width=818,height=68!
> 2) Actual jars diff between flavors
> !image-2022-03-03-22-26-57-626.png|width=817,height=208!
> 3) Suggested website with 3 tables (listening to your comments)
> part (a) synthetic table
> part (b) functionalities
> part (c) implementations
> !image-2022-03-26-11-41-27-229.png|width=1029,height=1926!
> 5) capture of other attempt
> !image-2022-03-25-11-18-14-708.png|width=796,height=591!
> 6) older attempt
> !image-2022-03-18-20-36-25-938.png|width=964,height=1840!
> 6) capture of much older version
> !image-2022-03-02-09-05-07-006.png|width=816,height=597!
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to