SWu opened a new issue #4519: [Relay] VM executor doesn't work with higher 
order gradient function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4519
 
 
   I'm using the 0.6.0 release of TVM, and functions generated by 
`relay.transform.gradient()` in higher order mode break with the following 
cryptic message when running in a VM executor:
   
   ```
   tvm._ffi.base.TVMError: Traceback (most recent call last):
     [bt] (8) /usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::ExprFunctor<void 
(tvm::relay::Expr const&)>::VisitExpr(tvm::relay::Expr const&)+0x8a) 
[0x7f95e58a7d0a]
     [bt] (7) 
/usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::vm::VMFunctionCompiler::VisitExpr_(tvm::relay::LetNode
 const*)+0x76) [0x7f95e5a27666]
     [bt] (6) /usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::ExprFunctor<void 
(tvm::relay::Expr const&)>::VisitExpr(tvm::relay::Expr const&)+0x8a) 
[0x7f95e58a7d0a]
     [bt] (5) 
/usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::vm::VMFunctionCompiler::VisitExpr_(tvm::relay::LetNode
 const*)+0x76) [0x7f95e5a27666]
     [bt] (4) /usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::ExprFunctor<void 
(tvm::relay::Expr const&)>::VisitExpr(tvm::relay::Expr const&)+0x8a) 
[0x7f95e58a7d0a]
     [bt] (3) 
/usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::vm::VMFunctionCompiler::VisitExpr_(tvm::relay::LetNode
 const*)+0x26) [0x7f95e5a27616]
     [bt] (2) /usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::ExprFunctor<void 
(tvm::relay::Expr const&)>::VisitExpr(tvm::relay::Expr const&)+0x8a) 
[0x7f95e58a7d0a]
     [bt] (1) /usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(tvm::relay::ExprFunctor<void 
(tvm::relay::Expr const&)>::VisitExprDefault_(tvm::runtime::Object 
const*)+0x71) [0x7f95e58a61e1]
     [bt] (0) 
/usr/tvm/build/libtvm.so(dmlc::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()+0x32) 
[0x7f95e5378a32]
     File "/usr/tvm/include/tvm/relay/expr_functor.h", line 120
   TVMError: Do not have a default for relay.RefCreate
   ```
   
   I'm not sure what exactly is missing in the VM implementation to support 
this; is there already an issue tracking what is needed for full support of 
executing Relay functions in the VM? In the meantime, should 
`relay.transform.gradient` default to `mode="first_order"` to reduce confusion 
by people trying to run those results in an executor?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to