slyubomirsky commented on PR #16744:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/16744#issuecomment-2008297192

   I think this idea is very promising, though we should be certain of some 
corners of the design:
   1. Is there any invariant we want to unknown purity? Do we expect all 
unknown purities to be resolved by a pass?
   2. Is unknown purity permitted in a DF block? We could defer checking it 
until after (say) a purity inference pass. However, deferring the check now 
means that the purity inference pass is another phase ordering dependency (not 
a big deal, but users need to remember to use it after any pass that adds new 
functions to the module).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to