ysh329 commented on PR #16242: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/16242#issuecomment-2662710168
> > isn't short circuiting the defined behavior for ternary expression? > > When generating codes for `a?b:c`, there might be bindings for b or c generated ahead. These binding codes are not protected by condition a. Hi, bohan, I recently am supporting Ternary Operator(like cond?true_branch:false_branch) in our device. I don't understand this modification. Can u explain this with a case? Thanks a lot! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
