jwfromm commented on pull request #7613: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7613#issuecomment-793273739
I think we could do that, yes, but I would argue that having a clear analogue to `qnn.quantize` and `qnn.dequantize` is conceptually much cleaner. It also has some benefits when moving from simulation to real qnn through pattern matching. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
