jinhongyii commented on a change in pull request #8467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/8467#discussion_r670129849
##########
File path: python/tvm/tir/schedule/schedule.py
##########
@@ -257,6 +257,133 @@ def get_loops(self, block: BlockRV) -> List[LoopRV]:
return _ffi_api_schedule.ScheduleGetLoops(self, block) # type: ignore
# pylint: disable=no-member
########## Schedule: loops manipulation ##########
+ def fuse(self, *loops: List[LoopRV]) -> LoopRV:
+ """Fuse a list of consecutive loops into one. It requires:
+ 1) The loops can't have annotations or thread bindings.
+ 2) The (i+1)-th loop must be the only child of the i-th loop.
+ 3) All loops must start with 0.
+
+ Parameters
+ ----------
+ *loops : List[LoopRV]
+ The loops to be fused
+
+ Returns
+ ----------
+ fused_loop : LoopRV
+ The new loop after fusion
+
+ Examples
+ --------
+
+ Before fuse, in TensorIR, the IR is:
+
+ .. code-block:: python
+
+ @tvm.script.tir
+ def before_fuse(a: ty.handle, b: ty.handle) -> None:
+ A = tir.match_buffer(a, (128, 128))
+ B = tir.match_buffer(b, (128, 128))
+ with tir.block([128, 128], "B") as [vi, vj]:
+ B[vi, vj] = A[vi, vj] * 2.0
+
+ Create the schedule and do fuse:
+
+ .. code-block:: python
+
+ sch = tir.Schedule(before_fuse, debug_mode=True)
+ i, j = sch.get_loops(sch.get_block("B"))
+ sch.fuse(i, j)
+ print(tvm.script.asscript(sch.mod["main"]))
+
+ After applying fuse, the IR becomes:
+
+ .. code-block:: python
+
+ @tvm.script.tir
+ def after_fuse(a: ty.handle, b: ty.handle) -> None:
+ A = tir.match_buffer(a, (128, 128))
+ B = tir.match_buffer(b, [128, 128])
+ for i0_i1_fused in tir.serial(0, 16384):
+ with tir.block([128, 128], "B") as [vi, vj]:
+ tir.bind(vi, tir.floordiv(i0_i1_fused, 128))
+ tir.bind(vj, tir.floormod(i0_i1_fused, 128))
+ tir.reads([A[vi, vj]])
+ tir.writes([B[vi, vj]])
+ B[vi, vj] = A[vi, vj] * 2.0
+
+ """
+ return _ffi_api_schedule.ScheduleFuse(self, loops) # type: ignore #
pylint: disable=no-member
+
+ def split(
+ self,
+ loop: LoopRV,
+ factors: List[Optional[ExprRV]],
Review comment:
Nonnegative constant integers are covered in ExprRV. So I think
List[Union[None, ExprRV]] is enough.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
