comaniac commented on pull request #13: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/13#issuecomment-887701334
> Deleting an issue is not something we should do - keeping a record of why something was rejected is useful on a later date to know why but perhaps the issue of too many issues with the label is solved by a query for open rfc-tracking issues ? > > Ramana I think the record would always be kept here. IIUC, tracking issues in the main repo are only used to track the RFC implementation progress, which is not necessary for rejected RFCs. IMHO this can also save some times for authors: If an RFC is rejected, then authors don't even need to waste time proposing an implementation plan. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
