tkonolige edited a comment on pull request #29:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/29#issuecomment-924166766


   I think this is a good and necessary change. Thanks!
   
   I agree with Andrew that it would be better to keep these parameters as a 
separate object. I think this makes a more consistent interface. We are all 
ready passing targets separately from the module, so it makes more logical 
sense to keep "RuntimeConfig" (or whatever you want to call it) separate. On 
the other hand, I'm also not opposed to moving target and "RuntimeConfig" into 
the IRModule. Passing around all these separate but related objects can be a 
pain and I think we are moving towards bundling them in the IRModule.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to