yzh119 edited a comment on pull request #10207: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/10207#issuecomment-1035993696
> Looks like the perf improvement isn't very much? Only when n = 4 the shuffle-down implementation is better than the shared memory implementation 🤔 My typo, I have fixed it. Another benefit of using shuffle-down is reducing the shared memory usage thus increasing the number of blocks can be executed concurrently. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
