YuchenJin commented on PR #89: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89#issuecomment-1285757823
There were concerns that bought up in [RFC #95](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95) that this RFC conversation did not cover "how proposal fit into TVM". We agree that discussing the fit is important and would like to refer to related conversations and sections: - https://github.com/YuchenJin/tvm-rfcs/blob/relax-upstream-rfc/rfcs/0089-relax-upstreaming.md#6-rationale-and-alternatives demonstrates the design deeply aligns with TensorIR, topi, symbolic shape and PackedFunc and many other modules. - https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89#issuecomment-1267729342 discusses the fit and how relax can address e2e dynamic shape compilation problem. - https://github.com/tqchen/tvm-rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/0091-establish-tvm-unity-connection.md outlines the fit of the unified composable flow. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
