Hzfengsy commented on PR #95: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#issuecomment-1288803485
@mbaret > I don't think it's fair or accurate to dismiss legitimate concerns of community contributors as 'subjective'. @areusch has already enumerated in some detail an 'objective' list of impacts that an S0 module can have on the wider project. I think at a minimum we should be addressing those points before implying that objecting to S0 modules is somehow improper (which of course it is not). I don't want to dismiss every concern and comment in the discussion (also other feedback from the community). It spent me some time to reply to @areusch as the comments are a bit long and I'm a non-native speaker, which costs me a bit more time to organize my words. > Let's keep it that way and make sure everyone feels welcomed, recognising that constructive debate (like that happening on this very RFC) benefits us all. Please directly point it out if I miss any public voice. And please let me know if you feel un-welcomed during the discussion and the reasoning. I'm not a native speaker, so maybe I will make mistakes in wording and may make you uncomfortable. If so, please also let me know, and I will apologize. Again, we are working on the points and trying to address them before voting, which will absolutely benefit TVM. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
