masahi commented on code in PR #13561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/13561#discussion_r1041836003
##########
tests/python/contrib/test_hexagon/metaschedule_e2e/test_resnet50_int8.py:
##########
@@ -125,8 +142,8 @@ def tune_vrmpy_auto_tensorize(mod, params,
hexagon_launcher):
# num_trials_per_iter=32,
# max_trials_per_task=128,
# strategy="evolutionary",
- builder=get_hexagon_local_builder(),
- runner=get_hexagon_rpc_runner(hexagon_launcher, number=20),
+ builder=get_hexagon_local_builder(max_workers=num_threads),
Review Comment:
I think `num_cores` is at least better than `num_threads`, but I don't have
better alternatives other than verbose ones like `num_cores_tuning` etc.
So I propose to use `num_cores` in `tune_relay` and `tune_tir` , thoughts?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
