leandron commented on code in PR #13934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/13934#discussion_r1143659008
##########
python/tvm/runtime/script_printer.py:
##########
@@ -65,38 +69,49 @@ def __init__(
) -> None:
if num_context_lines is None:
num_context_lines = -1
+ cfg = {
+ "show_meta": show_meta,
+ "ir_prefix": ir_prefix,
+ "tir_prefix": tir_prefix,
+ "relax_prefix": relax_prefix,
+ "buffer_dtype": buffer_dtype,
+ "int_dtype": int_dtype,
+ "float_dtype": float_dtype,
+ "verbose_expr": verbose_expr,
+ "indent_spaces": indent_spaces,
+ "print_line_numbers": print_line_numbers,
+ "num_context_lines": num_context_lines,
+ "syntax_sugar": syntax_sugar,
+ "path_to_underline": path_to_underline,
+ "path_to_annotate": path_to_annotate,
+ "obj_to_underline": obj_to_underline,
+ "obj_to_annotate": obj_to_annotate,
+ }
+
+ if name is not None:
+ cfg["name"] = name
self.__init_handle_by_constructor__(
- _ffi_node_api.PrinterConfig, # type: ignore # pylint:
disable=no-member
- {
- "ir_prefix": ir_prefix,
- "tir_prefix": tir_prefix,
- "relax_prefix": relax_prefix,
- "buffer_dtype": buffer_dtype,
- "int_dtype": int_dtype,
- "float_dtype": float_dtype,
- "verbose_expr": verbose_expr,
- "indent_spaces": indent_spaces,
- "print_line_numbers": print_line_numbers,
- "num_context_lines": num_context_lines,
- "syntax_sugar": syntax_sugar,
- "path_to_underline": path_to_underline,
- "path_to_annotate": path_to_annotate,
- "obj_to_underline": obj_to_underline,
- "obj_to_annotate": obj_to_annotate,
- },
+ _ffi_node_api.PrinterConfig, cfg # type: ignore # pylint:
disable=no-member
)
def _script(obj: Object, config: PrinterConfig) -> str:
return _ffi_node_api.TVMScriptPrinterScript(obj, config) # type: ignore #
pylint: disable=no-member
+def _relax_script(obj: Object, config: PrinterConfig) -> str:
+ func = get_global_func("script.printer.ReprPrintRelax")
+ return func(obj, config)
+
+
Review Comment:
Hi @junrushao - it seems this function accidentally was merged into `main`
as opposed to `unity` - can you push a follow-up PR and change it to the
appropriate branch?
It is one of the cases that a change was meted quite soon (in about 5h I
think) so not many people were able to look into it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
