[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Igor Vaynberg reassigned WICKET-1180:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Eelco Hillenius

go eelco go!

> Converters : final vs non final
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-1180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1180
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0-rc1
>            Reporter: Stephane Bailliez
>            Assignee: Eelco Hillenius
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I can understand the reason not to put anything extensible but then there is 
> a consistency problem as in the converters:
> all converters are final except: DateConverter, SqlDateConverter, 
> SqlTimeConverter, SqlTimestampConverter
> which then makes you wonder why the rest is actually final, DateConverter is 
> obviously not final to support inherirtance by the sql* converter, so if we 
> wanted to restrict it, the base class should have been abstract and the other 
> final, but it really does not protect  any significant api changes from the 
> client as the code is not so complex that it deserves to do so
> For instance I wanted to subclass ZeroPaddingConverter to work around the 
> null support and I realize it's final, so I  basically end up copying the 
> whole code.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to