[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nathan Hamblen updated WICKET-1166:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: submit-method-javadoc.patch

I'm not sure where the formal requirements would be, but I do find the method's 
documentation misleading for the current behavior: "Gets the method used to 
submit the form."  As I've said I think it's a reasonable solution to just 
update the javadocs, so, here's a patch that does that.

In the longer run I still think it would be better to lock down the submit 
process a little more. The same reasons that that is difficult are the reasons 
I think it should be done: with ajax and nesting, forms have become a pretty 
fuzzy concept in Wicket. For a user looking at the API it's not clear what will 
happen under various scenarios. But, that's just my opinion. Feel free to close 
with or without this javadoc patch.

> add sanity check on form submit for request method
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-1166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1166
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0-rc1
>         Environment: Safari 3
>            Reporter: Nathan Hamblen
>            Assignee: Igor Vaynberg
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.3.2
>
>         Attachments: submit-method-javadoc.patch, submit-method.patch
>
>
> When refreshing a frameset that includes an already POST submitted Wicket 
> form in a frame, using the redirect to render strategy, Safari erroneously 
> requests the form's original target by GET, rather than the location that was 
> eventually redirected to. Therefore none of the form values are available in 
> the request object and NPEs will occur trying to access them in places like 
> AbstractConverter.java:55.
> Because Form allows for a particular request method to be specified, I think 
> it should also confirm that the expected method was used instead of waiting 
> for an NPE in validation. The outcome is the same, but the cause of the error 
> (the client) would be more evident in server logs, etc. Patch to come...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to