Break circular dependency between DataView and IDataProvider (size versus 
offset/count)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: WICKET-1784
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1784
             Project: Wicket
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: wicket
    Affects Versions: 1.3.3
         Environment: Wicket 1.3.3
            Reporter: R. Goodwin


In some environments searches are performed in 'single call' fashion,
E.g. two queries performed by the data services tier before returning combined 
results to the UI tier:
i. Query for paged search results
ii. Query for a 'count' value representing total possible results

The contract between DataView and IDataProvider does not support a 'single 
call' environment as the give/take relationship between these classes is biased 
towards DataView.
DataView expects IDataProvider to provide it's size before providing 
IDataProvider with its offset and count.
* DataView may have good reasons for needing size before it can provide 
offset/count.
* But IDataProvider has equally good reasons for needing offset/count before it 
can provide size.

The circular dependency:
1. DataView calls IDataProvider.size()
2. IDataProvider cannot return size as it cannot start a query until it 
receives offset/count from DataView
3. These it does not receive until DataView calls IDataProvider.iterator() 
later on

Others who experienced this problem (with CODE examples):
* http://www.nabble.com/IDataProvider-and-Hibernate-Search-td15546101.html
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14266.html

---
The suggested solution of caching the combined search results and count value 
does not work if the search cannot begin until offset and count are available. 
And writing a custom DataView is not feasible either time wise as I understand 
that it cannot be done without needing to write a number of other classes too.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to