[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651564#action_12651564
]
Antony Stubbs commented on WICKET-1620:
---------------------------------------
Thanks for having a look Ate. But my intention was for you to reply to the
emails to the dev list about the implementation - you did not have to do all
this work yourself, as I was going to do it. But too late now I guess.
Before you go about understanding any of the code I wrote, let alone cleaning
it up or fixing those errors, I think it would be most valuable to actually
discuss the implementation, as it's not finalised, don't you think?
> Portlet 2.0 support
> -------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-1620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Reporter: Thijs Vonk
> Assignee: Ate Douma
> Attachments: myWicketPortal20Patch-example-project.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v2.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v3-example-project.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v3.patch, portlet2-0.patch, portlet2-0.patch,
> WICKET-1620-portlet2.0.patch
>
>
> Upgrade wicket to fully support portlet 2.0 (jsr 286;
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
