[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12671943#action_12671943
 ] 

uwe schaefer commented on WICKET-1861:
--------------------------------------

Awesome, thanks Igor! 

btw: on the caucho side there is a fix for 4.x branch, so it only effects 3.2.x.
For details: http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=2995

> Inevitable UnknownSizeException with HTTPS
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-1861
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1861
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.4-M3
>         Environment: Caucho Resin 3.2 behind apache2
>            Reporter: uwe schaefer
>            Assignee: Igor Vaynberg
>             Fix For: 1.4-RC3
>
>
> When using a FileUploadField in a HTTPS environment, the request always 
> returns a request-size of -1.
> In that case, FileUploadBase rejects to process the reuqest, no matter what 
> (or if) a maxSize is defined:
> org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase:236 (wicket 1.4m3)
> if (requestSize == -1) {
>  throw new UnknownSizeException( "the request was rejected because its size 
> is unknown");
> }
> this makes it impossible to use fileUploads with HTTPS in this environment at 
> all.
> I think, this _sanity check_ should not be done if either HTTPS is used, or 
> the developer does not care (expressed by not setting any maxSize).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to