[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834493#action_12834493
]
Antony Stubbs commented on WICKET-1620:
---------------------------------------
No, I don't think any of this code is in trunk. However, it worked very well.
It is quite out of date now, and will need changes to be applied cleanly to
trunk.
However, I have no interest in developing it further as I have moved on from my
previous position. However, I can be contacted through sharca.com if you're
interested in funding development.
Cheers!
P.s. I'm also out of the loop on what the Wicket team plans for eventing.
> Portlet 2.0 support
> -------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-1620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Reporter: Thijs Vonk
> Assignee: Ate Douma
> Fix For: 1.5-M1
>
> Attachments: myWicketPortal20Patch-example-project.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v2.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v3-example-project.patch,
> myWicketPortal20Patch-v3.patch, portlet2-0.patch, portlet2-0.patch,
> WICKET-1620-portlet2.0-tight.patch, WICKET-1620-portlet2.0.patch
>
>
> Upgrade wicket to fully support portlet 2.0 (jsr 286;
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
