[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980089#action_12980089
 ] 

Willis Blackburn commented on WICKET-3295:
------------------------------------------

Sure about the DataTable constructor that accepts List<IColumn<T>>?  It's not 
in 1.5-M3 so it must have been added very recently.

DataGridView does have both types of constructors.

I don't object to having constructors that take arrays;  I just would like to 
have List versions so I don't have to deal with arrays of generics and all 
those headaches.






> Please use lists instead of arrays
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-3295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3295
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket, wicket-extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.5-M3
>            Reporter: Willis Blackburn
>            Assignee: Martin Grigorov
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5-M4
>
>
> I'm working with 1.5-M3.
> In most places, indexed collections are lists.  But in a few places they're 
> arrays, which creates awkward integrations for various reasons.  The ones 
> that I've noticed are:
> 1.  DataTable accepts an IColumn<T>[] as a parameter, which is a pain to 
> construct because it's impossible to create a generic array.  Instead one has 
> to create a non-generic array (in other words an IColumn[]) or create a list 
> of IColumn<T> and then convert it to an array.  Either approach involves 
> suppressing some warning and is unfriendly to developers who don't grok the 
> ins and outs of using arrays and generics together.  If DataTable just 
> accepted List<IColumn<T>>, like DataGridView (which takes 
> List<ICellPopulator<T>>), then the issue will go away.  If DataTable wants to 
> use an array internally, then it can do the conversion itself.
> 2.  In the new AbstractMapper and several subclassses, the mount path is 
> represented as a String[].  But this collection has to intergrate with the 
> Url class, which represents the same concept as a List<String>.  Why not just 
> use List<String> and make it a little easier for everyone to write 
> AbstractMapper implementations?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to