[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Grigorov updated WICKET-3511:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: WICKET-3511.patch

Here is a bit lighter version from me.
Indeed the Wicket tests run 10 secs less here.
If my patch doesn't take away the benefit for your app then I'll update the 
javadoc and commit it.

Thanks!

> Mapping ResourceReferences to Urls is slow
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-3511
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3511
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.5-RC2
>            Reporter: Matt Brictson
>            Assignee: Martin Grigorov
>         Attachments: CachingResourceStreamLocator.java, WICKET-3511.patch
>
>
> PackageResourceReference is often used for stylesheets and JavaScript 
> resources, many of which can appear on a typical page (WicketAjaxReference is 
> one common example). Every time the page is rendered, these resources are 
> mapped to urls in order to build the appropriate <link href="..."> or <script 
> src="..."> tags.
> The trouble is that this mapping process is extremely inefficient. To map a 
> ResourceReference to a url, ResourceReference#getLastModified() must be 
> consulted for FilenameWithTimestampResourceCachingStrategy, and 
> ResourceReference#getUrlAttributes() is called to append appropriate query 
> parameters.
> In PackageResourceReference, both of these methods delegate to the very 
> expensive PackageResourceReference#lookupStream(), which makes several 
> attempts to locate the underlying file or classpath item using various 
> permutations of locale, style, and variation. Each of these attempts involves 
> I/O. The default ResourceStreamLocator, which does the actual file and 
> classpath queries, does no caching whatsoever.
> On a trivial Wicket page containing 7 total PackageResourceReferences for 
> images, stylesheets and JavaScript files, the average response time in my 
> tests was 211 ms. The vast majority of that time was spent in 
> ResourceStreamLocator, due to the expensive steps described above.
> It seems that putting caching at the ResourceStreamLocator would be extremely 
> beneficial. I am attaching a simple implementation. With caching enabled in 
> ResourceStreamLocator, the response time of my test page dropped from 211 ms 
> to 49 ms.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to