WebMarkupContainer breaks message-lookup  algorithm  
-----------------------------------------------------

                 Key: WICKET-4167
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4167
             Project: Wicket
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.5.2
            Reporter: Andrea Del Bene
            Priority: Minor


I've got a little problem with message lookup. The case is the following:

I've got a simple DropDownChoice (wicket id = testSelect) with some values, 
let's say "0" and "1". I want to localize these value in order to display 
"Sorry, it's bad" for zero and "Ok, its good!" for one. Since I want to reuse 
these bundle in other components and I don't want to insert them into 
Application.properties, the natural choice is to  create a package.properties 
file inside common package of my application components. The bundles are the 
following:

testSelect.0=Sorry, it's bad
testSelect.1=Ok, its good!

Ok, everything works fine for my testSelect and wicket supports this kind of 
customization. The problem arise when I decide to not add testSelect directly 
to my page but instead to add it to a WebMarkupContainer which groups other 
form components.
Unfortunately now testSelect localization stops working. Since 
WebMarkupContainer is not inside my application components package, now  
PackageStringResourceLoader search the right key (ex: testSelect.0) in the 
wrong package (i.e. org.apache.wicket.markup.html).

Is this a known issue? Can we modify PackageStringResourceLoader in order to 
extend key search across all loaded bundles (or at least across all parents 
bundles)? Any other idea?

PS: an obvious workaround is to create a subclass of WebMarkupContainer in our 
custom package.



--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to