[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140375#comment-13140375
 ] 

Igor Vaynberg commented on WICKET-4187:
---------------------------------------

also a testcase or a quickstart would really help
                
> Problem resolving markup in DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-4187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4187
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.2
>            Reporter: Martín Bigio
>
> There is a bug in the DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy when it comes to resolve 
> markup for a components that has the same ID that another one in the page
> For example given the following markup:
> <form wicket:id="form" />
>   ...
> </form>
> <form wicket:id="form" />
>     <div wicket:id="ajaxTabPannel" />
> </form>
> When swithing tabs DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy fails to get the appropiate 
> markup of a component given the markup of it's parent. As you can see in line 
> 95 of DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy, the class searches for any component 
> having the ID in process:
> line 95:   markup = markup.find(child.getId());
> The result of this bug is that in the end a MarkupNotFoundException is thrown 
> cause no markup could be found because it was searched in the wrong container 
> (the first form instead of the second one).
> Please let me know if this isn't a bug of the 1.5 serie (does it requiries 
> unique IDs all over the hierarchy?). A simple workaround is to have different 
> names for the components in conflic.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to