[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sven Meier closed WICKET-4963.
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.5.0
Now completely generified. Thanks!
> ComponentModel "setObject" methods should take generic "T" type instead of
> "Object"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-4963
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4963
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 6.4.0
> Reporter: Ota Hauptmann
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 6.5.0
>
>
> ComponentModel implements public final void setObject(Object object),
> although the parameter should be "T object". This expansion of type seems to
> be useless and it looks like forgotten piece of code from Wicket version
> which did not support generics.
> The same issue is with protected setObject(Component component, Object
> object) and the private inner WrapModel.
> Note: This issue also causes an issue with IntelliJ IDEA, which reports a
> method clash of ComponentModel and IModel because of same erasure (when
> creating a subclass of ComponentModel). It is possibly IDEA bug, because
> compilers have no problem with it, but it doesn't change the fact that the
> setObject signature is at least strange.
> I have tried to find this in JIRA, but unsuccessfully (so please accept my
> apologies whether I missed it only). The only "info" I have found was this:
> http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-05/msg01176.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
