[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825143#comment-13825143
 ] 

Mario Groß edited comment on WICKET-5406 at 11/18/13 7:34 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, but allowing inline JavaScript would kill most of the protection which the 
CSP provides. A middle or long-term goal to get rid of the inline scripts in 
Wicket would be the better way.


was (Author: magro28):
Yes, but allowing inline JavaScript would kill most of the protection of the 
CSP. A middle or long-term goal to get rid of the inline scripts in Wicket 
would be the better way.

> Better Content Security Policy Support
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-5406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5406
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket
>            Reporter: Mario Groß
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: CSP, Content-Security-Policy, Cross-site-Scripting, 
> Security
>
> A better support of the Content Security Policy 
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Security_Policy) would protect against 
> cross-site scripting attacks and improve the security image of wicket. 
> The main problem at the moment is the heavily used inline javascript code 
> which interferes with the whitelisting mechanism of script sources in the CSP 
> and should be avoided .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to