[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14178633#comment-14178633
 ] 

Andrea Del Bene commented on WICKET-5732:
-----------------------------------------

Reading back [~ivaynberg] blog post, I've found the following statement:
"As part of Queueing implementation Wicket will properly insert auto components 
into the Java hierarchy. Furthermore, auto components will remain in the 
hierarchy instead of being added before render and removed afterwords. " 


> Improve component queuing and auto component
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-5732
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5732
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Andrea Del Bene
>            Assignee: Andrea Del Bene
>            Priority: Critical
>
> One of the new feature implemented in Wicket 7 is component queuing (see 
> https://www.42lines.net/2014/02/28/component-queueing-in-wicket-7).
> Amongst other things, component queuing is aimed to improve auto components 
> usage.
> The current implementation of component queuing has raised some issues 
> (WICKET-5730, WICKET-5724) which might make impossible for a Wicket 
> application to migrate from 6.x to 7.x.
> As a consequence I've tried to find a solution that could solved the 
> encountered issues without changing the expected behavior for component 
> queuing. The solution can be seen in the new branch 'improvingQueuing' 
> (https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/improvingQueuing).
> However, this solution comes at the price of changing the current way Wicket 
> handles auto component. So far Wicket removes auto components added during 
> rendering phase after this latter has finished. On the contrary, my solution 
> implies that auto components must stay in their hierarchy
> This is of course quite a big change to Wicket internals, so ad Martin 
> Grigorov suggested, we should discuss it before merging it to master branch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to