[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15092188#comment-15092188
 ] 

Daniel Stoch commented on WICKET-5588:
--------------------------------------

{quote}
There is no way how to stop/enqueue an Ajax request and wait for the WS to 
serve its response, because you don't know when a WS push will be done.
{quote}
So why above patch works for me? :) Is it a problem only with using different 
channel name or something more general?
Beside this: what are the common use cases to use different channel for ajax 
request? I don't remember I was ever using this in my apps.

I have done a fast test in my app using your attached implementation of pushing 
the Ajax response via the WebSocket connection. And quick answer is: not 
everything works ok as in standard AjaxRequestHandler. And it would be very 
difficult to make quickstarts for these problems, because they can be very 
specific to my framework :(.
Examples:
- modal windows (I am using Bootstrap modal JS) does not always close,
- DataView is not refreshed when adding/removing objects from underlying 
collection,
- some JQuery effects stop working (highlights, fade outs): they are added to 
AjaxRequestTarget using append/prependJavaScript, some of them use "notify|..." 
syntax,
- in one situation I have an infinie loop of ajax requests.


> Mixing Ajax and push (Atmosphere/native-websockets) updates does not respect 
> order
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-5588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5588
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket, wicket-atmosphere, wicket-native-websocket
>    Affects Versions: 6.15.0, 6.21.0
>            Reporter: Daniel Stoch
>            Assignee: Emond Papegaaij
>         Attachments: 5588-ajax-thru-websocket.tgz
>
>
> As far as I know in Wicket ajax calls by default using the same channel and 
> they are queued. But in wicket-atmosphere integration on the client side the 
> refreshing is done by calling (inside wicket-atomosphere.js):
>   Wicket.Ajax.process(response.responseBody);
> It looks like Wicket.Ajax.process() function does not use channels 
> management, so it can result in out-of-order response processing. This method 
> was added to support Atmosphere push calls in Wicket. See the commit (for 
> issue: WICKET-4668):
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/130b063722e55510f2b2a3b47889e14210a5a32f
> *Example scenario to reproduce this problem:*
> When we try to refresh a component (panelA) via ajax when two different 
> threads in the "same" time perform such refresh.
> 1. The first thread (thread1) is a standard servlet container thread to 
> handle user request from a browser:
> - user clicks AjaxLink and on onClick method panelA is refreshed by 
> target.add(panelA).
> 2. The second thread (thread2) is a notification from a backend system which 
> causes a panelA refreshing too:
> - it can be done for eg. using Atmosphere integration by EventBus.post() - 
> panelA is refreshed by target.add(panelA) too.
> On the server side only one thread can access a page at a time so everything 
> is "queued" properly: the thread1 panelA refresh is executed, then the 
> thread2 refresh code is fired.
> But it looks like on the client side the order of ajax calls is undefined: 
> sometimes JS code added from the thread1 is executed as first, sometimes as a 
> second one. On my computer this order almost always is wrong. It leads to an 
> incorrect situation when the component state on a server is different than 
> the DOM tree on the client browser (so for example user can clicks not 
> existing link).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to