[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15633550#comment-15633550
 ] 

Andrea Del Bene commented on WICKET-6266:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Sebastian,

this might be actually an issue with your component resolver. A component 
resolver should keep tag's id updated with the id of the resolved component. So 
in your case you should add a line where you set this id :

{code}
String id = "custom" + container.getPage().getAutoIndex();
//new line
wtag.setId(id);
return new WebMarkupContainer( id );
{code}
 

> Component resolvers & variation broken in 7.5.0
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6266
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6266
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 7.5.0
>            Reporter: Sebastian Gooren
>            Assignee: Andrea Del Bene
>         Attachments: quickstart.zip
>
>
> Auto components fail to render in certain cases due to changes in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6231.
> See attached quickstart.
> If you use a component resolver in a page which overrides {{getVariation()}}, 
> but the html file for that page is the "default" one (without the variation 
> in the filename), wicket throws an RTE (MarkupNotFoundException: Markup not 
> found for Component: [WebMarkupContainer [Component id = custom0]]).
> Debugging reveals that this is caused by the change to 
> {{Component#getMarkup()}}. The markup that is set for auto-components might 
> not have the same variation as the html file in which it is used. Because of 
> this, the new {{markupHasCurrentVariation()}} returns {{false}}, and we fall 
> through to the end of {{getMarkup()}}. As the auto-component is dynamically 
> added on each render, {{parent.getMarkup(this)}} returns {{null}} - the 
> markup id gets created on the fly by component resolvers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to