[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16307533#comment-16307533
]
Martin Grigorov commented on WICKET-6509:
-----------------------------------------
bq. the rest looks fine except missing ,
There was no comma in your first comment!
bq. Is there some kind of snapshot repro?
Yes! See
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/8403c3725d71c33b87b3c4e196cf078e7762840d/archetypes/quickstart/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml#L185-L194
bq. include the pax-wicket stuff directly into wicket as a seperate module
I don't think this is a good idea for the following reasons:
1) No one from the core team uses OSGi at daily work, i.e. we do not have the
knowledge to develop and maintain it
2) There are not enough OSGi users
> Import junit packages as optional
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-6509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6509
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0-M8
> Reporter: Christoph Läubrich
> Assignee: Martin Grigorov
> Fix For: 8.0.0
>
>
> Currently the wicket-core and the wicket-util bundle import junit packages, I
> think they are not really required to run wicket but imported unintentionally.
> They could be excluded by adding !org.junit* to the maninifest header config
> section
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
