[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16340527#comment-16340527
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-6498:
----------------------------------------

Github user solomax commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/258#discussion_r164029599
  
    --- Diff: 
wicket-core/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/head/filter/FilteringHeaderResponseTest.java
 ---
    @@ -74,4 +75,22 @@ protected Response getRealResponse()
                CharSequence realContent = 
headerResponse.getContent(filterName);
                assertEquals(headerContent, realContent.toString());
        }
    -}
    +
    +   /**
    +    * WICKET-6498 all JavaScript resources have an "defer" attribute, all 
other JavaScript is
    +    * inside a {@code document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', 
function() {}; } hook.
    +    */
    +   @Test
    +   public void deferred() throws Exception
    +   {
    +           tester.getApplication().setHeaderResponseDecorator(new 
IHeaderResponseDecorator()
    --- End diff --
    
    this can be simplified to be
    ```
    tester.getApplication().setHeaderResponseDecorator(response -> new 
ResourceAggregator(new JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse(response)));
    ```


> wicket 8 - js to asnyc and or defer
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6498
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 7.9.0, 8.0.0-M8
>            Reporter: Korbinian Bachl
>            Assignee: Sven Meier
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: WICKET-6498-defer-support-2.patch, 
> WICKET-6498-defer-support.patch
>
>
> I wonder if wicket cant even get better in the js part. Currently each page 
> having ajax somehow ends up with following in the head:
> (1)<script type="text/javascript" 
> src="./wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jquery/jquery-2.2.4-ver-F9EE266EF993962AD59E804AD9DEBE66.js"></script>
> (2)<script type="text/javascript" 
> src="./wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/res/js/wicket-event-jquery-ver-E34C6FE16C54FE3DF3591290A48A496A.js"></script>
> (3)<script type="text/javascript" 
> src="./wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery-ver-F8010FEDC5FD9B05434A6023763E3050.js"></script>
> (4 - inline var and not really an issue)<script type="text/javascript" 
> id="wicket-ajax-base-url">
> /*<![CDATA[*/
> Wicket.Ajax.baseUrl="/pagepath";
> /*]]>*/
> </script>
> (5)<script type="text/javascript" >
> /*<![CDATA[*/
> Wicket.Event.add(window, "domready", function(event) { 
> wicketDebugBarCheckState();
> Wicket.Ajax.ajax({"u":"./effects?2-2.0-c1~link","c":"id6","e":"click","ch":"effects|d"});;
> Wicket.Ajax.ajax({"u":"./effects?2-2.0-c2~link","c":"id7","e":"click","ch":"effects|d","pd":true});;
> jQuery.noConflict();;
> Wicket.Event.publish(Wicket.Event.Topic.AJAX_HANDLERS_BOUND);
> ;});
> /*]]>*/
> </script>
> While 1,2 and 3 could be easily made at least defer, script 5 makes this 
> impossible so far, having all 4 scripts lead to a slower DOMContentLoaded 
> (requestet and executed 1 by 1), even these are not needed at that time and 
> could IMHO be easily postponed to a time when the rendering tree is ready 
> (and so dont block it);
> The real culprint IMHO is (5) and that it immediately needs the Wicket.Event 
> object - so, I see 2 solutions for this: 
> 1st: outline this code into a request specific js-src file that can be loaded 
> like e.g.: <script defer src="/requesrt specific fake path">
> or 
> 2nd: have it embedded into an 
> window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
>         (function($) {
>             $(document).ready(function() {
>                 // add the content here....
>             });
>         })(jQuery);
>     });
> of even slim it down to:
> window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
>         (function($) {           
>           // add the content here....
>         });
>     });
> While 1 has the need to get 1 more request (even thats async thanks to 
> defer), 2 seems to be clear of this and I cant think of any problem with that;
> What do you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to